Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get Ready (Acquittals loom in the Inglewood cop trial)
National Review OnLine ^ | July 17, 2003 | Jack Dunphy

Posted on 07/17/2003 10:08:06 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel

July 17, 2003, 9:55 a.m.
Get Ready
Acquittals loom in the Inglewood cop trial. Will trouble follow?

LOS ANGELES — Do you hear that? If you listen closely, you can hear the faint, far-off sounds of the No Justice, No Peace Hallelujah Chorus practicing their scales and limbering up the old vocal chords. That's right, soprano Maxine Waters, baritone Al Sharpton, bass Jesse Jackson, and all their assembled multitudes may soon be, as is their wont, raising a ruckus. Though the story has been largely eclipsed by other events in the national media, the two Inglewood, Calif. police officers indicted in last July's videotaped altercation with a teenager have been brought before the bar of justice. As the world knows, Los Angeles juries can be prone to irrationality at times, so predictions in such highly charged cases can be dicey, but I'm planning on working some overtime soon. Recall that Officers Jeremy Morse and Bijan Darvish were two of several officers involved in a July 6, 2002 fracas with 16-year-old Donovan Jackson, whose father had been stopped for driving a car with expired registration. The final moments of the incident were captured on a bystander's videotape, and for days and weeks thereafter few in the civilized world could escape the image of Morse slamming the handcuffed Jackson onto a police car's trunk and punching him in the mouth. Morse was charged with assault under the color of authority; Darvish, his partner that day, was charged with filing a false police report. The jury has now heard the prosecution's evidence, and what thin gruel it turned out to be. When prosecutors rested their case on Tuesday, some observers were prompted to ask, "That's it? That's all you got?"

L.A. County Sheriff's Commander Charles Heal, testifying for the prosecution as a use-of-force expert, told the jury on Monday that while he considered Morse's treatment of Jackson excessive, it did not rise to the level that would warrant criminal charges. "If [Morse] would have been my deputy, he would have got his chain rattled in my office," Heal testified under cross-examination. "Would I have filed [criminal charges] on him? No." What, then, the jurors might have wondered, are we all doing here?

Prosecutors sought to rebound from this setback on Tuesday by calling Inglewood P.D. Chief Ronald Banks and LAPD Captain Greg Meyer, both of whom testified that Morse's actions were excessive and inexcusable. But in relying on Heal, Banks, and Meyer as they have, prosecutors run the risk of seeing their testimony undercut by other use-of-force experts to be called when the defense presents their case. All three are high-ranking officers within their departments, and one doesn't get to be a high-ranking officer in any police department by mixing it up in gas-station donnybrooks. I don't care how many articles they've written or how many speeches they've given, I'll bet a paycheck that neither Heal, Banks, or Meyer has gotten his uniform dirty in 20 years. The defense will surely present use-of-force authorities whose expertise is more practical than theoretical, and whose testimony will likely carry more weight with the jury.

As if resigned to defeat, some in the anti-cop crowd were quick to denounce the prosecution's efforts. Max Huntsman and Michael Peterson, the two deputy district attorneys assigned to the case, came in for some colorful criticism from one Najee Ali, head of Project Islamic Hope. "What's up, Steve [Cooley, the county D.A]?" said Ali. "Why did you send us Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis? We want to know how come their best people weren't sent out instead of a comedy act."

An even more enlightening reaction came from Leo Terrel, the seldom-tranquil Los Angeles attorney. Reacting to Cmdr. Heal's admission that he did not believe Morse's actions to be criminal, Terrel nearly blew a gasket. "Are you telling me," he thundered, "that [prosecutors] couldn't find, out of all the use-of-force experts in the state, in the nation, one person that would have been loyal to them, and been on the same page?" Interesting that Terrel, who on his local radio show bills himself as "the fair-minded civil-rights attorney," should call for a witness to tailor his testimony so as to achieve some desired outcome.

We'll be hearing a great deal from Terrel and all the better-known cop bashers if the trial continues on its present course. It will be pointed out ad nauseam that only one black was on the jury, so when the acquittals come there will be all the more reason for the usual suspects to condemn them. All that furniture heisted in the '92 Rodney King riots is bound to be a bit threadbare by now, so some people may be looking forward to a shopping spree, one for which the bill never comes.

The jury may get the case as soon as next week. Look for me at Florence and Normandie.

— Jack Dunphy is an officer in the Los Angeles Police Department. "Jack Dunphy" is the author's nom de cyber. The opinions expressed are his own and almost certainly do not reflect those of the LAPD management.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: cop; inglewood; nojustice; nopeace; riot; selfdestruction; trial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 last
To: UCANSEE2
>>>>>>To me, the bottom line is did the officer cross the line. Did he go beyond self-defense or reasonable force? Was it payback? Was the payback an uncontrollable instaneous reaction? That is where the line gets really fuzzy. Should his police training have allowed him not to cross that line if that is what he did?<<<<<<<

Those are all legimate questions. Let's take what I am willing to concede--an instantaneous reaction to a physical assault that crossed the line into "unreasonable force".

First, it was brought under control PDQ; the officer did not continue using force. If this was a "'roid rage" like some have suggested, than it was a pretty controlled one.

Second, training cannot turn humans into automatons. Adrenaline, fear, and instinct lie just underneath the professalism of every person that uses force in their jobs (cops, soldiers, bodyguards, security officers, etc.)

I'll answer your questions with other questions of my own:
Can a police officer afford to lose a physical confrontation while performing their duties? If the names Sagon Penn, Tommy Riggs, Martha Ruiz, and Keith(?) Jacobs mean anything to you, than the answer is clear.

Should a man go to jail for one second of over reaction, an unpremeditated assault, if you will? Especially when the other party involved was also being violent?

I would'nt do that to a law enforcement officer. Yeah, fire him (already done) and offer the "victim" (I use that term loosely and perjoratively) a cash settlement (being negotiated). Criminal charges would'nt be brought against a bar bouncer or concert security man for popping an unwelcome and unruly patron in these circumstances. The only reason for the criminal prosecution in this case is political...

And that is sickening for me to watch. The minority underclass being pandered to by the race hustlers and vote whores in any major metropolitan area is a disgusting spectacle.
141 posted on 07/23/2003 4:02:38 PM PDT by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
>>>>>P.S. Please accept my apology for any attacks, or snide remarks earlier on this thread. I try hard not to do so, but it just sneaks through sometimes.<<<<<<

Well, I would'nt know a thing about that. ;-)

No need to apologize. It's really OK. BTW, I Freepmailed Judy with MY apologies, and I'll tell you, that is one lady to not cross keyboards with! But, hey, nobody got banned, suspended ot otherwise in trouble with the mods, and I am sure that there will be something coming up that we will find complete agreement on. There always is.

BTW, a 41 year old man is just a little smarter than a 21 year old punk, loser, fool. I would have to suppress my instinct to defend my daughter with the thought of the trauma of the search being multiplied by her having to watch me get shot or beaten. Crap like that can turn people into lifelong long haired maggot infested dope smoking hippie anarchists. Or DU posters...
142 posted on 07/23/2003 4:11:17 PM PDT by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; L,TOWM; JudyB1938
Too many Black-Americans have vested interests, property, etc. in LA now, to risk having a riot destroy it all.

The people you are referring to won’t riot and neither will I; and for the reasons you state.
Rioting has become an urban sport. There is a certain breed of urbanite that enjoys
the activity. While mostly Latino and black there are whites and Asians among their
ranks, too. Just look closely at the video.

Lakers championships, Piston championships, and police acquittals.
Any more it does not take much of an invitation to start a looting-riot.
Especially when there are never consequences.

CB^o

143 posted on 07/23/2003 4:15:19 PM PDT by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: OnTheDress
And I would agree with that. Lowlife comes in all flavors. I should know; I used to be one, and I was born with a terrible melannin deficiency...

;-)

BTW, your tagline is incomplete. His legacy was the stain on the dress, a big hole in Lower Manhatten, and a North Korean nutjob with nukes. :-((
144 posted on 07/23/2003 8:01:26 PM PDT by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
I saw Mr. Terrel screaming on TV "I'm here because of affirmitive action!!! I'm here because of affirmitive action!!!" All I could think of, "That may well be, Mr. Terrel - and precisely why it's got its down side." That guy is a certifiable nutcase, and shouldn't ever have risen above lavatory attendent in any sane society.
145 posted on 07/23/2003 8:26:01 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson