It's time Ottawa switched sides

The National Post ^ | July 17, 2003 | David Warren

[Loyalist]

The story is straightforward: Zahra Kazemi, a Canadian photographer of Iranian origin, went home to Iran, took pictures, got arrested, and was beaten to death. So why all the fuss? Iranians get beaten to death every day, and the victims of the regime have included not only talented female photographers, but many of Iran's most gifted writers and artists and thinkers. It is a mere accident that Ms. Kazemi had a Canadian passport, and they had not. Can such a document mean anything?

I wish it did, but it doesn't. As long-time Canadian travellers know, if you get into trouble abroad, you go to the American embassy, or the British, or the Australian, whichever's nearest. The Canadian who uses his own embassy to do anything more than renew his passport, or perhaps collect mail, is inexperienced. He shouldn't be travelling in dangerous places. Unfortunately for Ms. Kazemi, even phoning an embassy wasn't an option.

She knew she was taking risks in documenting Iran's vicious human rights abuses. She decided to take the risks -- for she was a brave and exceptional woman. We do not yet know quite why she was arrested, only that she found herself at the wrong place and time. This in no way justifies what the thugs of the "Islamic Revolutionary" theocracy did to her.

The only question is, what are we going to do about it? Will we make them pay, or will we shrug in the current official manner?

Bill Graham, our really embarrassing Foreign Minister, was reached by phone in Corsica, where he was on vacation, by Canadian reporters. He had spoken to the Iranian Foreign Minister, Kamal Kharrazi, who could give him no hard information whatever but assured him they were investigating.

Typically, Mr. Graham rushed to the defence of the Iranians, remarking they would be wanting to use this case to prove that they don't countenance human rights abuses. It hadn't yet occurred to him to demand Canadian participation in such an investigation. (It was our Deputy Prime Minister, John Manley, who later thought of that, summoning a return "how dare he!" blast from the Iranian Health and Interior Ministers.)

I wrote "typically" because Mr. Graham often makes such remarks, casually defending the honour of various sick, evil regimes, in the name of what is inaccurately called "diplomacy." But the naïveté of such statements goes so far beyond the realm of plausibility as to set off alarms among the sane.

Does Mr. Graham not know what goes on over there? Does he get his news only from the CBC?

Is he not aware that this regime sends scooter brigades of imported Arab and Afghan club-wielding thugs to split the heads of student and all other demonstrators? That Zahra Kazemi's case is not unusual in Iran, except in the one small particular that she happened to be travelling on a Canadian passport? That tales of beatings and untimely deaths in Persian prisons are daily fare? Is it possible a man is the Foreign Minister of a G7 country and doesn't know such things?

I very much doubt the men who tortured and murdered Zahra Kazemi were aware she was carrying a Canadian passport. They probably assumed she was "just another Iranian" from her appearance and facility with the language -- the regime feels fairly free in pummelling its own nameless subjects. Had they spotted the passport -- not that it was Canadian, but that it was a passport -- they might have been content to just smash her camera. How do I know this? Because I'm not naive.

Whereas over Mr. Graham, as over all members of the Canadian foreign service I've encountered, there is a real question. I don't get the impression these people are especially bad; one suspects some may even be well-meaning; they are just vacuously vain and completely uninformed. The instinct among them, to defend -- e.g. the ayatollahs from bad publicity, instead of Canadian citizens from Iranian thugs -- is not founded on anti-Canadian malice, but on some contorted Pavlovian commitment to "world peace."

In this case, Mr. Graham, who doubles as a politician, was caught somewhat by surprise. Only when he gets home will he discover he's a bit out of tune with the electorate on this one; and then the little fellow will start puffing and jumping and fuming against the "lack of co-operation" he will be continuing to receive from the Iranian side. It will be funny to watch, as when your kitten arches up and attacks your ankle.

The very people who hired the thugs to pummel Ms. Kazemi until she was comatose and would die of a brain hemorrhage -- thugs themselves too stupid to check if she was a foreign national first -- are hardly going to prosecute themselves. (The Iranian Vice-President, Mohammad Ali Abtahi, at least had the candour to admit how she died.)

The most we will get from them is a few scapegoats offered up to appease our fury. And that, only after unrelenting pressure from our Foreign Affairs Ministry, or a send-up in the international media (and this story has had no wings beyond our own borders).

What we can do is open our eyes. Canada (as France and several other European countries) has gone to great lengths to maintain good relations with the Iranian theocracy, to advance trade and encourage "dialogue." We have publicly rejected the American confrontationist position. In the name of Zahra Kazemi, it is time to switch sides.

© Copyright 2003 National Post

[Loyalist]

The Liberal government is quite happy to sacrifice its own citizens to the terrorist tyrannies of the world, just to satisfy its core constituency with the knee-jerk anti-Americanism that has become the whole of its default foreign policy.

Moreover, Foreign Affairs is still living in the dream world of Lester Pearson, when Canada was supposedly the 'honest broker' of the world.

If ever that world existed, it hasn't since the late 1960's, but nobody in Ottawa has gotten the message.

[Support Free Republic]

Aww man! Enough of the fundraiser posts!!!

Only YOU can make fundraiser posts go away. Please contribute!

[MEG33]

A canadian view.

[Tacis]

Check with most Americans. We know exactly what Ottawa will do. The Canadians will NEVER be concerned with what is right, only what APPEARS sensitive, is pro-Arab, or protects a revenue stream that adds to the personal wealth of certain individuals. Here, it is unusual, however for the Canadians, in response to the fact that a Canadian woman was beaten to death, to not immediately ask, "What did she do to make them so mad?"

[headsonpikes]

Regime change in Ottawa is our only hope; the corrupt Anglo Liberals are too pussy-whipped by their Quebecois colleagues to stand up like men.

Heads On Pikes!

[Podkayne]

Cool name - "Heads on Pikes"

[Cicero]

The U.S. State Department, as I have found from personal experience, has similar instincts. Being diplomatic with other countries is several orders of magnitude more important to them than helping or protecting American citizens. Since Americans are feistier about their rights as citizens than Canadians are, American diplomats are a little less obvious about it, maybe. But it's much the same here. Regardless of who happens to be president, the State Department will always be Foggy Bottom.

[headsonpikes]

Thanks. After the Commies are defeated I'll change it to headsonpints.

;^)

btw, any other freepers on Mars?