Is the case where the bozos from the ACLU were representing NAMBLA?
I think that's a different case. The substance of that case is that the NAMBLA should have the right to distribute information on how to rape children, because of the 1st amendment, and they can't be held criminally liable for it.
42 posted on 07/18/2003 11:31:03 AM PDT by xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)