[txzman]

No, no this can't be true. What the heck with the Dems have to campaign on? What will the liberal press have to talk about?

The sheer horror of it all! /sarcasm

[tet68]

I love it when a plan comes together.

Note to ted, don't play poker with a TEXAN.

[=Intervention=]

Yup. This squares with what I've read on the other thread (about the interview, but not the actual Newsmax piece). Still, I hope you're prepared for the hailstorm of comments about Newsmax not being a reliable source...*LOL*

-=I=-

[ConservativeMan55]

Contrast this with the drudge headline. I smell media bias.

[FairOpinion]

Well, well, well.

I can hardly wait to see the faces of the Democrats when details of this will get released.

[Support Free Republic]

Aww man! Enough of the fundraiser posts!!!

Only YOU can make fundraiser posts go away. Please contribute!

[Only1choice____Freedom]

Hhmm... I wonder..... Niger, yellow cake, France. smoking gun? Enough this time?

Will this even be reported like it's fact?

[CROSSHIGHWAYMAN]

I would be very skeptical with the release of this info at this time.

Forgery me once......shame on you

Forgery me twice........shame on me!!

[ChadGore]

Sounds like a great "October suprise"

[Centurion2000]

Can the DNC and liberals say ... OOPS ?

Of course they will claim these are forgeries.

[TUX]

W's modus operandi is like the old march song "The yellow bird(dims)with the yellow tail..flew on to my window sill..lured him in with crumbs of bread...then I crushed his fu##### head.

Six months is about right to lure them in before springing the trap.

[Mo1]

Brokaw ended his report on Kay's find with a clip of Tuesday's comment by Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass.; a move the newsman apparently intended as a reminder to Democrats who continue to carp about the lack of WMD evidence, that they're liable to be humiliated when the full story is known.

I doubt they'll take the hint

[Mr. Mojo]

I'm sure this'll be front page news in the Wash Post and NY & LA Slimes tomorrow. </ sarcasm>

[BenLurkin]

"AGAIN?"

[camle]

i hope this is true, i've had my hopes dashed before.

[Old Sarge]

How long will it take before President Bush is able to reveal what could be smoking gun justification of his decision to make war on Iraq? "I think we will have a substantial body of evidence before six months," Kay told NBC.

Mere words cannot express the satisfaction from my side of the screen.

I concur with our FRiend who mentioned the vetting theory. Intel has a shelf-life, and the use-by dates dictate when it can be released. I'm just glad it happened sooner than later.

[Porterville]

Wow, and last night I thought Brokav was just advocating the persecution of Mormons as terrorist, at least he's going after Iraq in some weird liberal journalistic way.

[Maringa]

Is this the old Democrat trick where they build up a potential report, overstate it, the media picks up on it and cooperates, and then when the final report comes out, it's really nothing and a big letdown.

[Sloth]

Get ready for a smackdown with extreme prejudice, Demonrats.

[eureka!]

The Rats know it. Notice how quiet it has been on the WMD front? Instead, it's "quagmire/'nam" and "16 words/W lied" 24/7. Oh yeah, most recently, the Iraqis hate us and the troops are p*ssed.

In any event, I do think that politics have a place in the release of the WMD proof inasmuch as the Rats have made it a political issue. Hehehehe....