Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. seeking global gun control?
WorldNetDaily.com ^

Posted on 07/16/2003 9:35:41 AM PDT by AZ GRAMMY

U.N. seeking global gun control? Conference moving toward plan that would regulate U.S. arms

Posted: July 16, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

A U.N. group is working toward establishment of an international system to register and regulate civilian possession of firearms, according to a former congressman.

The ultimate aim of many members of the conference on small arms is to outlaw personal ownership of guns altogether, said Georgia Republican Bob Barr in an interview yesterday on the newly syndicated WorldNetDaily Report with Joseph Farah.

Barr was an official representative of the U.S. State Department's delegation at the conference's week-long session last week. It is known officially as the first Biennial Meeting of States on the Implementation of the Program of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects.

At the beginning of the session, U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged members to redouble efforts to curb small arms and light weapons.

"The United Nations remains firmly committed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade of small arms and light weapons in all its aspects," he said.

The group will meet again in 2005, followed by a review conference scheduled for 2006.

If not for the U.S. State Department and organizations such as the National Rifle Association, "this locomotive would have had a lot more steam," Barr said.

Barr commended U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton for focusing the U.N.'s attention on international trafficking of illicit arms and not on U.S. ownership of arms.

"He has done an outstanding job of monitoring this and standing up to it in a way the State Department frequently does not do," Barr said.

However, Barr warned that many member nations, including the UK, Netherlands and India, want to set up a legally binding protocol requiring all U.N. countries to start registration of firearms.

The potential implications of that are enormous, he said, noting it is a small step toward the ultimate nightmare of American gun owners – "the U.N. knocking on our door to get our firearms."

"If we were to allow in any way, shape or form the U.N. to begin the process of registering and regulating fire arms – ultimately their goal of doing away with personal firearms – we would have dealt a blow to our sovereignty," he said.

Barr called on citizens to urge their representatives to stay on top of the issue and ensure the U.S. is not faced with a legally-binding document that would commit the country to some form of firearms registration and regulation by the U.N. or any outside authority.

"The presence of several anti-gun groups at this and other related conferences underscores the threat they pose to the constitutional rights of American citizens if we fail to closely monitor their activities," Barr said in a statement. "In fact, many of these groups receive substantial funding from anti-firearms governments to move their agenda."

During the conference, the Geneva-based Small Arms Survey released its findings for 2002, which paid special attention to U.S. gun ownership.

"By any measure the United States is the most armed country in the world," the report said. "With roughly 83 to 96 guns per 100 people, the United States is approaching a statistical level of one gun per person."

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33584

********************************************* Sec. 107. - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guncontorl; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2003 9:35:42 AM PDT by AZ GRAMMY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
come and get 'em... I dare you
2 posted on 07/16/2003 9:37:11 AM PDT by Mr. K (mwk_14059 on yahoo Instant Messenger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
"By any measure the United States is the most armed country in the world," the report said. "With roughly 83 to 96 guns per 100 people, the United States is approaching a statistical level of one gun per person."
Anyone who is frightened by this number should be frightened.

-Eric

3 posted on 07/16/2003 9:37:12 AM PDT by E Rocc (Reality is to liberals what garlic is to vampires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY

4 posted on 07/16/2003 9:37:30 AM PDT by Militiaman7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
Why not:

"The United Nations remains firmly committed to prevent, combat and eradicate terrorism in all its aspects," he said.

5 posted on 07/16/2003 9:38:46 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Exactly.
6 posted on 07/16/2003 9:41:01 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
Yes, the UN wants a global gun ban for non government officials. Look at IANSA..and who funds it.
7 posted on 07/16/2003 9:41:19 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
Click to download poster in PDF format

Home

8 posted on 07/16/2003 9:47:24 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
We still haven't gotten up to one measly gun per person yet? Where's my Shotgun News? I'll fix that.
9 posted on 07/16/2003 10:03:38 AM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
The UN's just looking out for the globalist interests. We're going to enter a time of vast over production with new plants in India and China turning out millions of cars, tables, and computer chips like never before. Wages are going to plummit as they'll work for food, and if they don't a robot will put it together for oil.
With this overproduction will come massive unemployment and then massive discontent with their condition. People will look fondly back to the 1950's when only the husband worked, they owned their home, took a vacation every year, and bought a new car every three. What do they have now? Both members work, they rent, and don't take a vacation.
When you have millions listless due to unemployment you're ripe for a revolution, for better or worse. The best way to prevent that from happening is to outlaw guns.
10 posted on 07/16/2003 10:08:48 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lelio
At a certain point the expedient thing will be to go down to NY and take them out.
11 posted on 07/16/2003 10:16:13 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud, hatch out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
U.N. seeking global gun control?

I can’t understand why WorldNetDaily would use the question mark in the title. The UN absolutely wants to do away with guns or power of any kind that is not under their direct control.

12 posted on 07/16/2003 10:22:47 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
Barr called on citizens to urge their representatives to stay on top of the issue and ensure the U.S. is not faced with a legally-binding document that would commit the country to some form of firearms registration and regulation by the U.N. or any outside authority.

This could easily be done with a liberal/socialist majority in Congress, but the Supreme Court is the most likely avenue for UN aims in America. An interpretation of the Second Amendment by a High Court sympathetic to the more "enlightened" UN/European point of view would legally nullify 200 years of Constitutional law.

Considering the activism of some of this High Court crowd, and their disregard for following Constitutional precedents, such a ruling may happen in the near future. This is one reason that judges must be elected by the people rather than appointed by politicians to lifetime jobs with no accountability to anyone.

If The People don't act then eventually all their rights will be taken from them, and they'll have no one to blame but themselves.
13 posted on 07/16/2003 10:27:47 AM PDT by Noachian (Legislation Without Representation is Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
I'd have to say I'm over-supplied.
14 posted on 07/16/2003 10:33:18 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lelio
I heard a guy on the radio last night whose company is in the business of analyzing trends. He said that given the loss of jobs in the U.S. we could actually have a middle class revolt. He was talking riots and all kinds of mayhem. I'm sorry I can't remember his name but it was pretty interesting. I think the government knows about these trends and would just LOVE to confiscate the guns. It's in their best interest. The UN and the various law enforcment agancies in the U.S. are NOT our friends.
15 posted on 07/16/2003 10:36:53 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I'd have to say I'm over-supplied.
Well then spread the love, bro!
If the gun count is 83 per 100 people, what's the ammo count? 20k bullets per person?
16 posted on 07/16/2003 10:43:10 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
Claire Wolf and Rabbi Aaron Zellman wrote a book about how the government will be making it's move to confiscate weapons soon because there is no Social Security and many other parts of the great charade are about to fall down.

When the people see the man behind the curtain ther may be hel to pay.
17 posted on 07/16/2003 10:50:10 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud, hatch out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
BUMP!
18 posted on 07/16/2003 10:54:06 AM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lelio
I've regretted the loss of every gun I ever sold or traded.
19 posted on 07/16/2003 11:15:29 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
The potential implications of that are enormous, he said, noting it is a small step toward the ultimate nightmare of American gun owners – "the U.N. knocking on our door to get our firearms."

Note to Congress: And if that should come to pass... ALL BLOODY HELL will break loose!

20 posted on 07/16/2003 11:32:09 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson