Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan departs from pacifist stance, plans two aircraft carriers
The Straits Times ^

Posted on 07/15/2003 8:38:05 PM PDT by overtaxed_canadian

Japan departs from pacifist stance, plans two aircraft carriers Perception of North Korean threat may have led to decision

By Richard Halloran

HAWAII - The Japanese navy is preparing to build two small aircraft carriers, its first in more than 60 years, according to Japanese and United States officials.

The plan is further evidence that Japan is departing from its pacifist post-World War II Constitution that restricts its military to self-defence.

Advertisement

The carriers can be deployed as command ships in a task force to give the Maritime Self-Defence Force, as the Japanese navy is called, a modest ability to project power into the sea-lanes that are vital to Japan's trading economy.

That capability is likely to draw protests from China, North Korea and South Korea, which were invaded by Japan during World War II.

Tokyo's decision to go ahead with the aircraft-carrier plan is believed to be prompted by its perception of an immediate threat from North Korea and a longer-term threat from China.

In its 2003 White Paper on defence published last week, the Self-Defence Agency asserted in more forceful terms than in earlier versions that the nation must build up its fundamental defence capabilities to ensure its independence.

In that respect, Japan is on the verge of building a missile defence. It has also just launched a second pair of intelligence satellites to watch North Korea.

Tokyo also recently passed laws giving the Self-Defence Forces wider latitude in defending their homeland.

Funds for the first small carrier have been included in Japan's defence budget for fiscal year 2004, beginning April 1 next year. The second carrier is scheduled for fiscal year 2005.

Japanese naval officers are calling the new ships 'destroyers' instead of 'aircraft carriers' in an effort to avoid triggering opposition from those against enhanced defence in Japan as well as from China and the two Koreas.

Yet drawings of the warship show the flat deck of an aircraft carrier and an 'island', or command structure, at the starboard or right edge of the deck.

Moreover, officials familiar with the ship's design said the deck and hangar below are capable of handling aircraft such as the joint strike fighter being developed by Lockheed Martin, a leading US defence contractor. That fighter, also called the F-35, is scheduled to go into production in 2008 just as the first Japanese carrier is ready for sea.

The F-35 will be a supersonic warplane capable of flying at 1 1/2 times the speed of sound. It will also incorporate stealth technology to enable it to evade radar detection.

The Japanese vessels will be comparable in size to Spain's 16,700-ton Principe De Asturias, which carries 17 planes.

The plan calls for equipping the carriers with new SH-60 Seahawk helicopters, which are designed to patrol the ocean, to detect submarines, and to protect the fleet.

The first ship is to be commissioned in 2008, the second in 2009. Two more may be built later.

An earlier proposal by the Self-Defence Forces to buy 'jump jets', that can fly as fighters or bombers, for four 14,700-tonne assault ships ran into political opposition. But that was before Japan got worried about North Korean missiles and nuclear arms.


TOPICS: Extended News; Japan
KEYWORDS: japan; navy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last
To: LN2Campy; John O
thanks ... good info ...
81 posted on 07/16/2003 4:41:26 PM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
The last time I flew into Philly I saw the Forrestal and Saratogo mothballed in the Naval Shipyard.
82 posted on 07/16/2003 8:01:50 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyRidden
The book also said that the US economy was going to be based on take out pizza, software and hollywood movies. everything else would be manufactured outside the US.

Strike the software part, add government jobs and you've got a pretty good prediction.
83 posted on 07/16/2003 8:05:45 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
yep and more and more "Hollywood" movies are being made in Canada ... that leaves take-out pizza and Wal-Mart greeters ...
84 posted on 07/16/2003 9:27:30 PM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Killed several old growth redwoods.

And a family picnicking. The only casualties of WWII on the Continental US.

85 posted on 07/17/2003 2:28:57 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: overtaxed_canadian
About time!
86 posted on 07/17/2003 2:52:38 AM PDT by RightWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
And a family picnicking. The only casualties of WWII on the Continental US.

I think the picnickers were killed by an intercontinental balloon-borne incindiary bomb.

The third manner in which the continental states were attacked (submarine cannon fire being the third).

87 posted on 07/17/2003 6:41:37 AM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion
I doubt very much these ships would be nuclear powered. 13,000 tons is a pretty small platform, not to mention it just complicates construction and greatly increases the price. The Japanese would probably operating locally mostly, and wouldn't require the cruising range performance that we do.

My guess for propulsion would be gas turbines (with maybe diesels for economy cruising).
88 posted on 07/17/2003 6:44:28 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY (20 years in the Navy; never drunk on duty - never sober on liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
I think the size limitation encourages the use of nuke power. It is certainly big enough to justify it, if not demand it, and it would free up a lot of space/tonnage not used for fuel.

Besides, (on a less serious note) the Japanese have been the masters of efficiency and miniaturization for 50 years...they might be able to fit a flight contingent of 100 fighters plus support aircraft on the last toy I played with in the bath tub. :-) Just think what they could do with 13,000 tons!
89 posted on 11/12/2003 4:22:49 AM PST by blanknoone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson