Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt
I dont understand why these people who have been together longer than I have been married (17 years) cannot share the same benefits (and legal ties) that I share with my partner.

Thanks VL for helping society try to make a mockery of the sacred union of man and woman. Thanks for trying to define marriage as everything until it means nothing. If you're not from Vermont, you should be.

265 posted on 07/17/2003 5:29:28 AM PDT by Archie Bunker on steroids
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]


To: Archie Bunker on steroids
You cannot make a distinction between the legal state of marriage and the religious state. I think the biggest mistake the gay community has made is to call it "marraige." By definition, marraige is between a man, a woman and God. You will not get an argument from me on that.

What I am for is the legal definition of a contractual obligation between two people. Why shouldnt they be able to enter into the same state--from a legal perspective--to transfer property, AND be legally bound to each other until the contract is dissolved.

You guys will never win the legal fight,but you will never lose the moral/religous fight. So my point is why fight over this.
271 posted on 07/17/2003 1:20:09 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson