To: Wade McClusky
Aren't we just as guilty when we insist that the "scientific-method"-based language of the creation be changed so as to allow "wiggle room" for 6,000 years, the Flood, and dinosaurs in the Garden of Eden? If there is a "censorship on the left" chapter, I would be interested to hear about "censorship on the right". Could you elaborate a bit? I am a young-earth creationist - and am interested in a reasoned dialogue on the subject (as opposed to the constant ad hominem diatribe that often passes as "debate").
To: LiteKeeper
LiteKeeper, I'm not big on debating this subject in it's particulars.
Suffice to say, I'm a Christian but I don't buy the creationist narrative over the unfolding picture of what happened that the scientific method has given us. I don't see God and science as incompatible, nor do I see God as being threatened by scientific inquiry.
Science for the glory of God? Why not? Conservatism as a rational outgrowth of scientific views, tempered by loving faith? Sure, I like it.
Anyway, the creation is not that big a part of my personal faith when compared to the life and death of Jesus.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson