Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clintons Lose Whitewater Appeal
NYT ^

Posted on 07/15/2003 8:37:04 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Clintons Lose Whitewater Appeal By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 10:49 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The federal government does not have to pay for the bulk of former president Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton's legal fees arising out of the Whitewater independent counsel investigation, an appeals court ruled Tuesday.

The Clintons had sought reimbursement for more than $3.5 million in lawyer costs stemming from the long-running probe of the failed Arkansas land deal.

But a federal appeals panel issued a 14-page decision ruling the Clintons would have been investigated with or without the appointment of an independent counsel, and therefore should pay the overwhelming majority of those legal costs.

The federal government will pay $85,312.01 to the Clintons in legal fees for their lawyers' review and response to the counsel's final report, the judges ruled.

``We harbor no doubt that in the absence of the independent counsel statute the allegations surrounding the Clintons, Madison Guaranty, and Whitewater would have been similarly investigated and prosecuted by the Department of Justice,'' the three-judge panel wrote.

A spokeswoman for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton did not immediately return a call for comment. Sen. Clinton's most recent financial disclosure forms show the couple owed between $1.7 million and $6.5 million in outstanding legal bills.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beelzebubba; clinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: irish guard
"Good God, how much lattitude do these folks get?

Far more than they deserve! Whitewater is just the tip of the ice burg.

Hillary's egregious remarks made in the past two weeks are tantamount to treason. The junior senator is pushing for a Socialist America by trying to divide and polarize Americans and our allies. She is fodder for the terrorist; they love her. America can't afford this woman she is just plain evil; bad mouthing ones country is hardly what she should be doing, she is an embarrassment. New Yorkers, you have opened Pandora's box with this woman, Marxism is her name! Recall her - throw her out into the gutter with other anti-American activists, that is where she belongs.

41 posted on 07/15/2003 9:47:21 AM PDT by yoe (When Hillary speaks, you can hear those big boots coming across the bridge......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LeftiesBinWhinin
And Sheets-Byrd says that it's all "BUNK!! B.U.N.K. BUNK!!"
42 posted on 07/15/2003 9:49:53 AM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
... or maybe Mr. and Mrs. Grifter will present their attorneys with real, gen-u-ine autographed copies of their books in lieu of fees!

g

43 posted on 07/15/2003 9:56:36 AM PDT by Geezerette (... but young at heart!-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; Mia T

When Alex kills a woman during a rape, Alex is sent to prison.
When clinton rapes women, girls, his country and God knows what else. . .
not clinton but society is imprisoned,
imprisoned in clinton's
besmirched, semen-stained, feckless presidency.
 

A risible and repulsive result;
yet not even the punch line.

While Alex is conditioned in prison with aversion therapy,
transmuted into a moral robot who becomes nauseated
by the mere thought of sex and violence,
bill clinton and his Thought Police,
in a perverse reverse aversion,
have conditioned society's collective brain
into not mere acquiescence but twisted admiration.
 

In the end,
if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
it seems the joke will be on all of us,
for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.
 

We will have set apart clinton as the hero
by making his victims less human than he;
we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
as much as clinton himself does.

Mia T, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE


44 posted on 07/15/2003 9:59:02 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJemison
With the number of "unexplained and mysterious" deaths following the Clintons around, I think we can the attys to write off as uncollectible. ;-)

OTOH, theh Clintons cannot accept this as a gift. Hmmm

45 posted on 07/15/2003 10:01:07 AM PDT by katze (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
They stole enough from the american people and took enough bribes they wont even miss a meesley 3.5million if they ever pay thier bill.I dought they will ever pay what they owe.Chi-coms will come through and pay it for them.
46 posted on 07/15/2003 10:05:33 AM PDT by solo gringo (Always Ranting Always Rite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Most high-powered lawyers bill at $400-600/hour or more.

(Heck, JUNIOR associates at K-Street Law firms bill at 250/hr)

And no fractional hours: put in 1 second of work, bill an hour. . .
47 posted on 07/15/2003 10:12:55 AM PDT by Salgak (don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
How long until the lawyers begin to sue for payment? I say 60 days from today.
48 posted on 07/15/2003 10:19:09 AM PDT by theDentist (Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: Salgak
Oh, I'm well aware of the ridiculous prices of DC lawyers. I know too many of them. Let me put the figures another way: At $400/hour, that's having an attorney work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for an entire year.

I'm not just blaming the Clinton lawyers here, either. Reports of Starr spending upwards of $40 million are a reflection of just how ridiculous the whole attorney fee mess is. $40 million is an awful lot of cash.

50 posted on 07/15/2003 10:22:05 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Bump
51 posted on 07/15/2003 10:49:44 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Here's the Fox News online story. A bit more complete than AP. However, I still haven't heard the story mentioned on air!

WASHINGTON — The federal government does not have to pay for the bulk of former president Bill Clinton (search) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (search)'s legal fees arising out of an independent counsel investigation into a failed Arkansas land deal, an appeals court ruled Tuesday.





The Clintons had sought reimbursement for more than $3.5 million in lawyer costs stemming from the Whitewater probe, which lasted more than seven years and cost taxpayers $70 million.

The Clintons were never indicted, but a 14-page decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia notes the independent investigation into Whitewater (search) and other matters ultimately resulted in 24 indictments, at least 16 convictions and the president's impeachment.

The special appeals panel was the same one that appointed Kenneth Starr (search) to take over the investigation in 1994 and then authorized him to investigate matters surrounding White House intern Monica Lewinsky (search).

The couple's lawyer, David Kendall, issued a statement saying that former President Ronald Reagan was reimbursed for 72 percent of his legal costs stemming from the Iran-Contra investigation, and his vice president George Bush was reimbursed for 59 percent of his costs in the same matter.

The Clintons, Kendall said, were reimbursed for only 2 percent of their request for Whitewater costs.

"The facts and the numbers speak for themselves," said Kendall. "The good news is that the partisan Whitewater smoke-and-mirrors investigation is finally over."

Sen. Clinton's most recent financial disclosure forms show the couple owed between $1.7 million and $6.5 million in outstanding legal bills.

The Clintons had asked to be reimbursed for the costs of responding to the Whitewater probe, arguing they would never have faced such an expensive, lengthy process if not for their positions as President and First Lady.

The appeals court rejected that argument, ruling the Clintons would have been investigated with or without the appointment of an independent counsel, and therefore should pay the overwhelming majority of those legal costs.

"We harbor no doubt that in the absence of the independent counsel statute the allegations surrounding the Clintons, Madison Guaranty (search), and Whitewater would have been similarly investigated and prosecuted by the Department of Justice," the panel wrote.

The Clintons can be reimbursed for $85,312.01 in legal fees relating to the review and response to the counsel's final report, because a federal prosecutor normally does not issue such a report, the judges ruled.

The ruling also found the independent counsel law was designed so that reimbursement for fees "should be difficult; that such fees will not be a common thing."

In 1996, Reagan was awarded $562,111 in legal fees after an appeals court said he had reason to believe he faced a "realistic possibility" of being indicted in the Iran-Contra investigation, which was led by an independent counsel. Reagan had sought over $777,000.

Bush was reimbursed $272,352 for his costs connected to the probe.
52 posted on 07/15/2003 10:57:57 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras
Nope...it's when they're paid....
53 posted on 07/15/2003 10:58:09 AM PDT by ken5050 (ann coulter NEEDS to have kids ASAP....her gene pool has to be passed on.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
The media ignores Hillary Rodham Clinton is a sitting Senator when they wish, it seems to me, and treat her as a former "First Lady". Otherwise microphones should be shoved in her face today asking how she could say in her book and in her recent interviews that Whitewater was nothing.

Directly from today's ruling:

Clintons Lose Appeal, will need to repay over $3 Million in Legal Fees

Excerpt:

In 1978, then-Arkansas Attorney General William Jefferson Clinton, his wife Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Jim and Susan McDougal purchased 230 acres of undeveloped property in Arkansas. To develop the property they formed a partnership known as the Whitewater Development Company. In 1982 Jim McDougal purchased a savings and loan and renamed it Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan Association. Over the next few years, Jim McDougal and Madison Guaranty were involved in questionable financial transactions, some of which benefitted Whitewater Development. Also during this time period Mrs. Clinton and one of her law partners, Webster Hubbell, performed legal work for Madison Guaranty involving at least one of the questionable transactions. These activities eventually drew the attention of federal bank regulators, who made a criminal referral in 1992 to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Little Rock. The referrals alleged that Jim and Susan McDougal had fraudulently misused bank accounts at Madison Guaranty to benefit entities owned by them, including Whitewater Development. Additional referrals soon followed, some of which concerned questionable campaign contributions to Mr. Clinton in 1985. The U.S Attorney’s Office undertook an investigation, and in late 1993 transferred the case to the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice.

She hasn't been cleared of anything. Just managed to stonewall.

54 posted on 07/15/2003 11:33:16 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; jla
Whatever...

Although you wouldn't know it from their schnorrer moves,
we're talking nanodrops...
in the
clinton LIEbury slush-fund bucket...

And while on the topic of bucks and buckets...
had those two
slime-buckets raped me...
I would impoverish them.

Oh wait... They DID rape me...

THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER
Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992*
Q ERTY6ENTROPY BUMP!

hear

*Thanx to Cloud William for text and audio

 

LEHRER: President Bush, your closing statement, sir.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Three weeks from now--two weeks from tomorrow, America goes to the polls and you're going to have to decide who you want to lead this country ...

On foreign affairs, some think it's irrelevant. I believe it's not. We're living in an interconnected world...And if a crisis comes up, ask who has the judgment and the experience and, yes, the character to make the right decision?

And, lastly, the other night on character Governor Clinton said it's not the character of the president but the character of the presidency. I couldn't disagree more. Horace Greeley said the only thing that endures is character. And I think it was Justice Black who talked about great nations, like great men, must keep their word.

And so the question is, who will safeguard this nation, who will safeguard our people and our children? I need your support, I ask for your support. And may God bless the United States of America.

(Applause)

 
play tape
 



eyes wide shut

EPILOGUE: (ADDITIONAL AUDIO)
Hear Christopher Shays: "The bottom line: HE DID RAPE BROADDRICK."

When Alex kills a woman during a rape, Alex is sent to prison.
When clinton rapes women, girls, his country and God knows what else. . .
and kills? --- check out those fourscore-plus deaths, please!
And don't forget the wag-the-dog, desperately-seeking-a-legacy bombings,
or the cold-blooded Ricky Ray Rector execution---
not clinton but society is imprisoned,
imprisoned in clinton's
besmirched, semen-stained, feckless presidency.
 

A risible and repulsive result;
yet not even the punch line.

While Alex is conditioned in prison with aversion therapy,
transmuted into a moral robot who becomes nauseated
by the mere thought of sex and violence,
bill clinton and his Thought Police,
in a perverse reverse aversion,
have conditioned society's collective brain
into not mere acquiescence but twisted admiration.
 

In the end,
if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
it seems the joke will be on all of us,
for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.
 

We will have set apart clinton as the hero
by making his victims less human than he;
we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
as much as clinton himself does.

Mia T, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE

The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime

 
 
GEFILTE FISHY
 
by Mia T

 

 
The clintons:
Meshuga, tref, tsuris.
Shopworn shtick, schmaltz, tsimmes.
Ganef, schlemiel, schlimazel.
A crooked putz with a big schnozzle.
 
Nudnik, nebbish, tummler.
Two chachkas on Geraldo's mantle, two schnorrers.
Kibitzer, kvetch with chutzpah.
Yenta, spieler, two stuffed kishkas.

 

 
BAGELby Mia T
 
A Katz's delicatessen bump. 
(The best in New York City.) 
(Send  your boy in the Army a salami)
(It's a Jewish thang, ya wouldn't understand!)
--dennisw
 
 
 
Me, I prefer a New York bagel, some nova and a (fat-free) schmeer. . .
 
The bagel's attenuation, BTW,
has nothing whatever to do with triangulation,
Safire notwithstanding.
(The clintons analogize not to the bagel's substance but to its hole.)
 
The modern bagel is not trying to be a doughnut.
The doughnut-ization of the bagel is illusory.
The tough torus softened because of technology,
not demographics, or even demagogues. . .
It all boils down to boiling...
and, according to some bagel purists, New York water!
 
Real bagels are first boiled in a kettle,
then rinsed and cooled in a fresh water trough.
Only then are they baked.
 
The boiling process
reduces the starch and increases the gluten
to produce the real bagel's
characteristic leaden heft, golden brown thin crust and chewy center.
 
So-called bagel stores in recent years have skipped this very important step.
They steam the bagels in a rack oven
producing the ubiquitous,
(and quite-by-accident doughnut-esque),
ersatz bagel.
 
Why this happened:
Real-bagel makers are dying off and taking their trade secrets with them.
Real-bagel making is more time- and labor-intensive.
Boiling reduces shelf-life...
Would that we had parboiled the co-presidents, too...
Q ERTY8missus clinton's REAL virtual office update bump

55 posted on 07/15/2003 11:40:53 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Jul 15, 4:20 PM EDT

Clintons Lose Whitewater Appeal

By DEVLIN BARRETT
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The federal government does not have to pay for the bulk of former president Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton's legal fees arising out of an independent counsel investigation into a failed Arkansas land deal, an appeals court ruled Tuesday.

The Clintons had sought reimbursement for more than $3.5 million in lawyer costs stemming from the Whitewater probe, which lasted more than seven years and cost taxpayers $70 million.

The Clintons were never indicted, but a 14-page decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia notes the independent investigation into Whitewater and other matters ultimately resulted in 24 indictments, at least 16 convictions and the president's impeachment.

The special appeals panel was the same one that appointed Kenneth Starr to take over the investigation in 1994 and then authorized him to investigate matters surrounding White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

The couple's lawyer, David Kendall, issued a statement saying that former President Ronald Reagan was reimbursed for 72 percent of his legal costs stemming from the Iran-Contra investigation, and his vice president George Bush was reimbursed for 59 percent of his costs in the same matter.

The Clintons, Kendall said, were reimbursed for only 2 percent of their request for Whitewater costs.

"The facts and the numbers speak for themselves," said Kendall. "The good news is that the partisan Whitewater smoke-and-mirrors investigation is finally over."

Sen. Clinton's most recent financial disclosure forms show the couple owed between $1.7 million and $6.5 million in outstanding legal bills.

The Clintons had asked to be reimbursed for the costs of responding to the Whitewater probe, arguing they would never have faced such an expensive, lengthy process if not for their positions as President and First Lady.

The appeals court rejected that argument, ruling the Clintons would have been investigated with or without the appointment of an independent counsel, and therefore should pay the overwhelming majority of those legal costs.

"We harbor no doubt that in the absence of the independent counsel statute the allegations surrounding the Clintons, Madison Guaranty, and Whitewater would have been similarly investigated and prosecuted by the Department of Justice," the panel wrote.

The Clintons can be reimbursed for $85,312.01 in legal fees relating to the review and response to the counsel's final report, because a federal prosecutor normally does not issue such a report, the judges ruled.

The ruling also found the independent counsel law was designed so that reimbursement for fees "should be difficult; that such fees will not be a common thing."

In 1996, Reagan was awarded $562,111 in legal fees after an appeals court said he had reason to believe he faced a "realistic possibility" of being indicted in the Iran-Contra investigation, which was led by an independent counsel. Reagan had sought over $777,000.

Bush was reimbursed $272,352 for his costs connected to the probe.

Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved.

56 posted on 07/15/2003 1:53:53 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
The Clintons were never indicted, but a 14-page decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia notes the independent investigation into Whitewater and other matters ultimately resulted in 24 indictments, at least 16 convictions and the president's impeachment.

I wonder if any of the Alphabet channels on TV will even mention this story,much less name the 16 Convictions of The Clinton Appointed Cronies.Surrounded by Manipulative Losers and Jailed as Manipulative Losers. (Well, I can only dream they would be capable of mentioning this story.)

57 posted on 07/15/2003 2:23:41 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
The couple's lawyer, David Kendall, issued a statement saying that former President Ronald Reagan was reimbursed for 72 percent of his legal costs stemming from the Iran-Contra investigation, and his vice president George Bush was reimbursed for 59 percent of his costs in the same matter.

The Clintons, Kendall said, were reimbursed for only 2 percent of their request for Whitewater costs.

"The facts and the numbers speak for themselves," said Kendall.

Yes, the numbers do speak for themselves. Does Kendall think they look GOOD for his conniving clients?

LOL

58 posted on 07/15/2003 2:25:46 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Pagey
See my excerpt at 54, directly from today's ruling, saying HRC was involved in doing legal work on at least one of those "questionable (we know what THAT means) transactions.

(I know we knew that, but it is satisfying to see it committed to paper in such a legal ruling.)

If any Republican cavorted with the likes of the McDougals, had associates like Hubbell who had been given a post at the DOJ and ended up in jail, or had a whiff of engaging in "questionable" activity such as this, they would have been deemed unfit for national public office long ago.

Mrs. Clinton ought to be called to account for this, but she won't. However, we can make note of it and take comfort that the record is being written--a record that no amount of spin will change.

59 posted on 07/15/2003 2:34:42 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Republic
ping
60 posted on 07/15/2003 2:42:20 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson