Couric Suggests President Bush Engaging in "A Pattern of Deception"

The Today Show

[governsleastgovernsbest]

No intentional deception has been demonstrated. But for Katie, it's already time to be darkly musing that President Bush is engaging in "a pattern of deception."

[MEG33]

It will continue ..Facts are not important.

[Support Free Republic]

She wants to look her best for her subjects.
>	Make a fashion statement. Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[an amused spectator]

Kute Katie Kommie, The Affable Eva Braun of morning television.

[governsleastgovernsbest]

ping

[Mr. K]

I wonder if perky Katie (did they ever find her brain on that colonoscopy show?) ever suggested Clinotn engaged in a pattern of deception- or how she feels about the numerous allegations that clintoon raped several women?

[netmilsmom]

I give you lots of credit for monitoring this trite for us. I can't watch it.

[Diogenesis]

Is this not the Couric and NBC who said,
"Saddam hopefully fled to Syria".

---

Couric and NBC salute Americans and patriots worldwide.

[Behind Liberal Lines]

I've often thought (and forgive me if I've mentioned this before), the conservatives out there need to write NBC and tell them that, not only won't they watch the Today Show, but that they won't watch ANY NBC show until Couric stops.

And cc the sponsors.

[bmwcyle]

She is just an over paid B^&$H.

[GodBlessRonaldReagan]

GodBlessRonaldReagan suggests Katie Couric is engaging in a pattern of deception.

[Pikachu_Dad]

Ann Coulter answer: "No, the Democrats are engaging in a pattern of misinformation. The biased liberal press are fanning the flames. And both are attempting to undermine this President by destroying this country."

Or something else that is very clever along those lines.

[Miss Marple]

Yep. I think they need to hear from us. I think anyone who is a GE stockholder needs to speak up as well.

[governsleastgovernsbest]

At your service, parachuting behind enemy media lines to send reports back to command central at FR!

[Miss Marple]

And it is much appreciated, too!

[YaYa123]

great reporting on the Curok interview! If the daily thread gets up, you should place it there too so more people can read it. I was watching too, and the other point that interested me:

Kennedy up and at em this early in the morning, signals how seriously the Dems are going after Bush. (Like Terry McAuliffe on MSNBC's Press & Buchanan yesterday).

And I noticed Kennedy's line of attack: He said Bush had a failed policy toward Iraq...That we were "Bankrupt, adrift, and the ones paying the price....American soldiers."

Kennedy's main point: "We have got to bring in the international agencies. Kofie Anon said this administration has not even talked to the UN. So says Kennedy. Then Kennedy says, "I don't believe we faced an imminent threat from Saddam...Al Quada was and is the real danger.

Kennedy finished off with, "Iraq isn't America's problem, it's the world's problem."

[MEG33]

Thanks as always for inflaming me!

[an amused spectator]

"Could the Bush administration be seen to be engaging in a pattern of deception?"

We're beginning to see that Ann Coulter's thesis about these people in the book Treason is correct.

The United States has a huge strategic interest in being in Iraq. We needed to remove an Arab dictator, to show the other Arab dictators that it could be done. We needed to shift our base of operations from a hostile country, Saudi Arabia, to a newly created Arab democracy. We needed to remove any possibility that Iraq would be used as a base for terrorist operations, and a source of materials for terrorists. The operation also destabilised the dictatorship in Iran. These are four huge strategic goals achieved for America, and we nailed a sadistic, vicious mass-murderer to boot.

Katie Couric would have attacked the Normandy invasion as unjustified if she'd been around in 1944.

[elhombrelibre]

Someone should ask her this question. Did Clinton bungle intelligence when he attacked Iraq after saying: "Now, let's imagine the future. What if he [Saddam] fails to comply and we fail to act or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And someday, some way, I guarantee you, he will use the arsenal” - Bill Clinton, Meet the Press, February 17, 1996 ."

[governsleastgovernsbest]

Great quote. Odds of Couric using it roughly equal to those of me winning the British Open golf tourney this week!