Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couric Suggests President Bush Engaging in "A Pattern of Deception"
The Today Show

Posted on 07/15/2003 4:40:59 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

In the course of just-completed interviews on The Today Show, Katie Couric wondered aloud whether, with respect to the justification for the war with Iraq, President Bush engaged in "a pattern of deception."

Couric's guests were Senators Ted Kennedy and Republican Richard Shelby.

Couric began with Kennedy, and started by lobbing him the softest of softballs: "We've seen a firestorm erupt. What is the most upsetting thing?"

When Kennedy wandered too much into suggestions that NATO and other troops share part of the burden in Iraq, Katie yanked him bank to where she wanted to go - an attack on President Bush. Thus she stated: "Let's get back to charges that Bush administration manipulated intelligence."

Kennedy obligingly stated that "the buck stops in White House. The administration trying to pin the blame on CIA head George Tenet. The President's credibility is at stake. There should be open congressional hearings."

In fairness, it should be reported that Couric concluded the interview with Kennedy by asking: "How do you get to bottom of the issue without politicizing it too much? Dem presidential contenders are obviously seizing on it."

Of course her pious words were belied by the thrust of her interviews, particularly when she turned to Republican Shelby. Gone were the softballs, replaced by high-hard ones under the chin.

Couric: "The basic question is why Pres. Bush included in the State of the Union the statement about Saddam seeking nuclear materials in Africa when Tenet told him not to include it in an earlier speech and Colin Powell was also uncomfortable with it?"

Shelby responded: "I believe however that Pres. Bush's policy on Iraq is sound, but the CIA didn't serve President well in this instance."

Couric literally couldn't contain herself, and interrupted him, shouting "But the CIA told him in October not to keep it in! Is it the CIA's or the White House's fault?"

Couric then employed one of her favorite techniques: quoting the liberal press to make a point she wouldn't dare make in her own name. Thus she quoted that bastion of objectivity and high journalistic standards, the NY Times editorial page, to this effect:

"'The British made us do it' defense would be more credible if British intelligence had a better track record for accuracy. In fact, the British relied on unverified internet reports."

Once again, Shelby retorted that the policy of Bush administration was sound, but that it was not well-served by the CIA.

Finally, referring to the controversy surrounding Pres. Bush's allegation that Saddam had obtained aluminum tubes for purposes of his nuclear program, Katie dropped this bombshell: "Could the Bush administration be seen to be engaging in a pattern of deception?"


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: liberalmedia; medianews; presstitutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
No intentional deception has been demonstrated. But for Katie, it's already time to be darkly musing that President Bush is engaging in "a pattern of deception."
1 posted on 07/15/2003 4:40:59 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
It will continue ..Facts are not important.
2 posted on 07/15/2003 4:42:34 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
She wants to look her best for her subjects.
>

Make a fashion statement. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/15/2003 4:42:52 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Kute Katie Kommie, The Affable Eva Braun of morning television.
4 posted on 07/15/2003 4:43:30 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
ping
5 posted on 07/15/2003 4:44:35 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I wonder if perky Katie (did they ever find her brain on that colonoscopy show?) ever suggested Clinotn engaged in a pattern of deception- or how she feels about the numerous allegations that clintoon raped several women?
6 posted on 07/15/2003 4:47:26 AM PDT by Mr. K (mwk_14059 on yahoo Instant Messenger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I give you lots of credit for monitoring this trite for us. I can't watch it.
7 posted on 07/15/2003 4:47:55 AM PDT by netmilsmom (God Bless our President, those with him & our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Is this not the Couric and NBC who said,
"Saddam hopefully fled to Syria".


Couric and NBC salute Americans and patriots worldwide.


8 posted on 07/15/2003 4:48:05 AM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I've often thought (and forgive me if I've mentioned this before), the conservatives out there need to write NBC and tell them that, not only won't they watch the Today Show, but that they won't watch ANY NBC show until Couric stops.

And cc the sponsors.
9 posted on 07/15/2003 4:48:10 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
She is just an over paid B^&$H.
10 posted on 07/15/2003 4:49:45 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
GodBlessRonaldReagan suggests Katie Couric is engaging in a pattern of deception.
11 posted on 07/15/2003 4:50:18 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (where is Count Petofi when we need him most?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Ann Coulter answer: "No, the Democrats are engaging in a pattern of misinformation. The biased liberal press are fanning the flames. And both are attempting to undermine this President by destroying this country."

Or something else that is very clever along those lines.
12 posted on 07/15/2003 4:50:44 AM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Yep. I think they need to hear from us. I think anyone who is a GE stockholder needs to speak up as well.
13 posted on 07/15/2003 4:51:14 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
At your service, parachuting behind enemy media lines to send reports back to command central at FR!
14 posted on 07/15/2003 4:51:50 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
And it is much appreciated, too!
15 posted on 07/15/2003 4:52:44 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
great reporting on the Curok interview! If the daily thread gets up, you should place it there too so more people can read it. I was watching too, and the other point that interested me:

Kennedy up and at em this early in the morning, signals how seriously the Dems are going after Bush. (Like Terry McAuliffe on MSNBC's Press & Buchanan yesterday).

And I noticed Kennedy's line of attack: He said Bush had a failed policy toward Iraq...That we were "Bankrupt, adrift, and the ones paying the price....American soldiers."

Kennedy's main point: "We have got to bring in the international agencies. Kofie Anon said this administration has not even talked to the UN. So says Kennedy. Then Kennedy says, "I don't believe we faced an imminent threat from Saddam...Al Quada was and is the real danger.

Kennedy finished off with, "Iraq isn't America's problem, it's the world's problem."

16 posted on 07/15/2003 4:53:01 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks as always for inflaming me!
17 posted on 07/15/2003 4:53:06 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Could the Bush administration be seen to be engaging in a pattern of deception?"

We're beginning to see that Ann Coulter's thesis about these people in the book Treason is correct.

The United States has a huge strategic interest in being in Iraq. We needed to remove an Arab dictator, to show the other Arab dictators that it could be done. We needed to shift our base of operations from a hostile country, Saudi Arabia, to a newly created Arab democracy. We needed to remove any possibility that Iraq would be used as a base for terrorist operations, and a source of materials for terrorists. The operation also destabilised the dictatorship in Iran. These are four huge strategic goals achieved for America, and we nailed a sadistic, vicious mass-murderer to boot.

Katie Couric would have attacked the Normandy invasion as unjustified if she'd been around in 1944.

18 posted on 07/15/2003 4:53:21 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Someone should ask her this question. Did Clinton bungle intelligence when he attacked Iraq after saying: "Now, let's imagine the future. What if he [Saddam] fails to comply and we fail to act or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And someday, some way, I guarantee you, he will use the arsenal” - Bill Clinton, Meet the Press, February 17, 1996 ."
19 posted on 07/15/2003 4:53:32 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Great quote. Odds of Couric using it roughly equal to those of me winning the British Open golf tourney this week!
20 posted on 07/15/2003 4:57:27 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson