I find it troubling that you insist on putting words in my mouth and assume what I do and do not agree with. I criticize Republicans ALL the time when I BELIEVE they are doing wrong; I don't do it to satisfy somebody else and take some kind of test to satisfy the rest of you.
I criticized Bill Clinton because he was a sleazeball and made a mockery of the laws in this country. Until George W. Bush does something remotely close to the trashing that man gave to the legal system in this country, don't you DARE insinuate I'm two faced about it. They don't even come close to comparing.
My use of you was not meant as a specific you but a general you of Bush-Bots. I've seen many on this forum cite an event done by Clinton (not his moral lapses) and yet President Bush does something similar or even more damaging to the cause of conservatism and see it not only go untouched by many of the Bush-bots but even embraced.
I agree Clinton was a sleeze ball. No argument. But as so many here have stated, policy wize in many ways he has been more conservative than President Bush. Even for someone as moderate as I, his policies and positions have me taking a double take. And then I come here and see it defended by those much further to the right than I. And many times with the warning that it's not nice to criticize the President.