Replies

My use of you was not meant as a specific you but a general you of Bush-Bots. I've seen many on this forum cite an event done by Clinton (not his moral lapses) and yet President Bush does something similar or even more damaging to the cause of conservatism and see it not only go untouched by many of the Bush-bots but even embraced.

I agree Clinton was a sleeze ball. No argument. But as so many here have stated, policy wize in many ways he has been more conservative than President Bush. Even for someone as moderate as I, his policies and positions have me taking a double take. And then I come here and see it defended by those much further to the right than I. And many times with the warning that it's not nice to criticize the President.

and yet President Bush does something similar or even more damaging to the cause of conservatism

Well, that's where we disagree; you evidently believe anything that you don't agree with Bush on is a "danger" to conservatism. I never thought I'd agree with him 100 percent. You're bound to hate him if that's the way you look at it 24/7.

BTW, I'm sick of being called a Bush Bot........shall I call you an Anti-Bush Bot???