You're lock step in protecting something that shouldn't in all cases be protected. And I keep going back to the point of if GWB was a democrat and held to the same policies and actions that he has exhibited thus far, both of you would be all over him like flies on stink. But since he's a republican, then he gets a pass. I find that troubling.
How to make a case of when GWB is in error on this forum is a challenge. I don't want to see him trashed any more than you, but if he is the cause of erosion of conservative ideals, then it needs to be recognized. Constructively.
And yes, I do believe for security he is better than Gore would have been. I am concerned over the WMD issues and the Al-Queda links that haven't panned out.
I find it troubling that you insist on putting words in my mouth and assume what I do and do not agree with. I criticize Republicans ALL the time when I BELIEVE they are doing wrong; I don't do it to satisfy somebody else and take some kind of test to satisfy the rest of you.
I criticized Bill Clinton because he was a sleazeball and made a mockery of the laws in this country. Until George W. Bush does something remotely close to the trashing that man gave to the legal system in this country, don't you DARE insinuate I'm two faced about it. They don't even come close to comparing.