[Howlin]

YOu didn't really answer my question though, did you? What is the difference between the Bots being in lock-step and the malcontents being in lock-step.

Other than the fact that you don't agree with us.

I'm not even going to bother arguing with you over whether ALL Bots say the things you're saying they say.

All I want to know is why is ONE lock-step different from the other?

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Tick.

Tock.

Tick.

Tock.

(I want to know that, too.)

[joesbucks]

You're lock step in protecting something that shouldn't in all cases be protected. And I keep going back to the point of if GWB was a democrat and held to the same policies and actions that he has exhibited thus far, both of you would be all over him like flies on stink. But since he's a republican, then he gets a pass. I find that troubling.

How to make a case of when GWB is in error on this forum is a challenge. I don't want to see him trashed any more than you, but if he is the cause of erosion of conservative ideals, then it needs to be recognized. Constructively.

And yes, I do believe for security he is better than Gore would have been. I am concerned over the WMD issues and the Al-Queda links that haven't panned out.