Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Nuke Basher Admitted Saddam Sought the Bomb
NewsMax.com ^ | 7/14/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 07/14/2003 10:18:46 AM PDT by kattracks

The diplomat who set off a political firestorm last week when he told the New York Times that President Bush may have "exaggerated" when he told the nation that Iraq sought nuclear fuel in Africa admitted last October that he believed Saddam Hussein had "an aggressive program to try and get" nuclear weapons.

Though former acting U.S. ambassador to Iraq Joseph C. Wilson's op-ed in the Times warned that Bush might have led the U.S. to war "under false pretenses" by ginning up a bogus nuclear threat, he was singing a different tune during an appearance on Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes" nine months ago.

Under close questioning by Sean Hannity, Wilson insisted that Saddam "doesn't have nuclear weapons, to the best of anybody's knowledge."

But then, in an admission that contradicts the central point of his Times op-ed, Wilson added, "though he has an aggressive program to try and get them."

Last week, Wilson cited his inability to confirm an Iraq-Niger nuke connection to conclude in the Times: "Some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the nuclear threat."

But if, as Wilson told "Hannity & Colmes" in October, he believed Saddam indeed had an "aggressive" nuclear program at the time, his claim that Bush distorted the nuclear threat seems disingenuous at best.

The full exchange between Hannity and Wilson went like this:

HANNITY: Wait a minute. If he's still – if he's going after – if he's going after weapons of mass destruction, with his willingness to use them, and your belief, have – they having told you they'd use them, isn't it important we get him before he got these other weapons? Wouldn't that be ...

WILSON: Well ...

HANNITY: Wouldn't that make good sense in your mind?

WILSON: Well, first of all, Sean – just a second. Just let me be very clear. He has chemical weapons.

HANNITY: Right.

WILSON: He has biological weapon capability ...

HANNITY: Right.

WILSON: ... and may have biological weapons. He doesn't have nuclear weapons, to the best of anybody's knowledge, even though he has an aggressive program to try and get them.

HANNITY: He's working hard to get them, but – but, I mean, if we don't ...

WILSON; That's right. [End of Excerpt]

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Bush Administration
Saddam Hussein/Iraq



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; josephcwilson; josephwilson; nukes; seanhannity; warlist; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2003 10:18:46 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
revisionist RAT history BUMP!
2 posted on 07/14/2003 10:22:18 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Keep Free Republic Rockin' 'Round The Clock!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/14/2003 10:23:13 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; William McKinley
Ping
4 posted on 07/14/2003 10:27:11 AM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Thanks!
5 posted on 07/14/2003 10:29:38 AM PDT by William McKinley (You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Look what Wilson said about Iraq's nuclear weapons program last October - singing a different tune back then.
6 posted on 07/14/2003 10:36:36 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Thanks Peach!
7 posted on 07/14/2003 10:38:16 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
A new addition to my list of reasons I think Wilson has an agenda and is not credible in his criticism of Bush.
8 posted on 07/14/2003 10:38:21 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
If any investigation is done by Congress, it should be on Wilson and his Wife
9 posted on 07/14/2003 10:41:09 AM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Was Wilson's op-ed posted on FR???
10 posted on 07/14/2003 10:41:31 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Someone set him up the bomb.
11 posted on 07/14/2003 10:41:44 AM PDT by William McKinley (You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I can not find a lick of information on Wilson's wife.......nada!
12 posted on 07/14/2003 10:42:27 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley; MJY1288; PhiKapMom; Miss Marple; BOBTHENAILER; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Well, as many of us have noted this past week, Wilson appears to be nothing but a lying wh$re for the rats.

Good for Sean!
13 posted on 07/14/2003 10:44:02 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Reach out and pound the liberals daily! Become a $/day donor to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Lookee here!
14 posted on 07/14/2003 10:44:20 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Plame is her last name and she is an operative in the CIA
15 posted on 07/14/2003 10:44:46 AM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Where's that thread on FR?
16 posted on 07/14/2003 10:45:54 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Yes it was
17 posted on 07/14/2003 10:45:56 AM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dog
If so, I cannot find it. Here's a copy though.
18 posted on 07/14/2003 10:46:40 AM PDT by William McKinley (You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
*BUMP* !
19 posted on 07/14/2003 10:48:13 AM PDT by ex-Texan (My tag line is broken !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Here is one thread on this lying POS Rat:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/945331/posts

Report: CIA Source on Niger Nuke Flap is a Bush-Hater (Wilson)
NewsMax.com ^ | 7/13/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff


Posted on 07/13/2003 9:45 AM PDT by kattracks



The man who helped set off a media firestorm over President Bush's State of the Union reference to Iraq seeking uranium in Niger is actually a confirmed Bush-hater who opposed the war in Iraq and complained in March that Bush had led America into a period of "historical madness."

In his New York Times op-ed piece last Sunday, so-called career diplomat Joseph Wilson said he was tapped by the CIA to investigate whether there was any truth to the Niger uranium story. After traveling to the country and interviewing government and industry officials, Wilson said he couldn't find anyone who would confirm that Niger sold uranium to Iraq.

In fact, President Bush never claimed that the transaction had been completed, telling Congress instead, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Still, Wilson's inability to confirm something Bush hadn't claimed prompted him to write:

"I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat."

Writing in the National Review Online, GOP consultant Cliff May reveals that media portrayals of Wilson as a disinterested career diplomat may be quite an exaggeration in and of themselves.
20 posted on 07/14/2003 10:49:45 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Reach out and pound the liberals daily! Become a $/day donor to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson