Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mission to Niger
TownHall.com ^ | 7/14/03 | Robert Novak

Posted on 07/14/2003 1:23:09 AM PDT by kattracks

WASHINGTON -- The CIA's decision to send retired diplomat Joseph C. Wilson to Africa in February 2002 to investigate possible Iraqi purchases of uranium was made routinely at a low level without Director George Tenet's knowledge. Remarkably, this produced a political firestorm that has not yet subsided.

Wilson's report that an Iraqi purchase of uranium yellowcake from Niger was highly unlikely was regarded by the CIA as less than definitive, and it is doubtful Tenet ever saw it. Certainly, President Bush did not, prior to his 2003 State of the Union address, when he attributed reports of attempted uranium purchases to the British government. That the British relied on forged documents made Wilson's mission, nearly a year earlier, the basis of furious Democratic accusations of burying intelligence though the report was forgotten by the time the president spoke.

Reluctance at the White House to admit a mistake has led Democrats ever closer to saying the president lied the country into war. Even after a belated admission of error last Monday, finger-pointing between Bush administration agencies continued. Messages between Washington and the presidential entourage traveling in Africa hashed over the mission to Niger.

Wilson's mission was created after an early 2002 report by the Italian intelligence service about attempted uranium purchases from Niger, derived from forged documents prepared by what the CIA calls a "con man." This misinformation, peddled by Italian journalists, spread through the U.S. government. The White House, State Department and Pentagon, and not just Vice President Dick Cheney, asked the CIA to look into it.

That's where Joe Wilson came in. His first public notice had come in 1991 after 15 years as a Foreign Service officer when, as U.S. charge in Baghdad, he risked his life to shelter in the embassy some 800 Americans from Saddam Hussein's wrath. My partner Rowland Evans reported from the Iraqi capital in our column that Wilson showed "the stuff of heroism." President George H.W. Bush the next year named him ambassador to Gabon, and President Bill Clinton put him in charge of African affairs at the National Security Council until his retirement in 1998.

Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him. "I will not answer any question about my wife," Wilson told me.

After eight days in the Niger capital of Niamey (where he once served), Wilson made an oral report in Langley that an Iraqi uranium purchase was "highly unlikely," though he also mentioned in passing that a 1988 Iraqi delegation tried to establish commercial contacts. CIA officials did not regard Wilson's intelligence as definitive, being based primarily on what the Niger officials told him and probably would have claimed under any circumstances. The CIA report of Wilson's briefing remains classified.

All this was forgotten until reporter Walter Pincus revealed in the Washington Post June 12 that an unnamed retired diplomat had given the CIA a negative report. Not until Wilson went public on July 6, however, did his finding ignite the firestorm.

During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, Wilson had taken a measured public position -- viewing weapons of mass destruction as a danger but considering military action as a last resort. He has seemed much more critical of the administration since revealing his role in Niger. In the Washington Post July 6, he talked about the Bush team "misrepresenting the facts," asking: "What else are they lying about?"

After the White House admitted error, Wilson declined all television and radio interviews. "The story was never me," he told me, "it was always the statement in (Bush's) speech." The story, actually, is whether the administration deliberately ignored Wilson's advice, and that requires scrutinizing the CIA summary of what their envoy reported. The Agency never before has declassified that kind of information, but the White House would like it to do just that now -- in its and in the public's interest.

©2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Contact Robert Novak | Read Novak's biography



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 16words; alanfoley; cia; cialeak; josephwilson; niger; plame; robertnovak; sotu; uranium; valerieplame; valerieplamewilson; wilson; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Wilson's report that an Iraqi purchase of uranium yellowcake from Niger was highly unlikely was regarded by the CIA as less than definitive, and it is doubtful Tenet ever saw it. Certainly, President Bush did not, prior to his 2003 State of the Union address,....

The story, actually, is whether the administration deliberately ignored Wilson's advice, ....

How could the administration have ignored Wilson's advice if they never saw his report?

Report: CIA Source on Niger Nuke Flap is a Bush-Hater (Wilson)

1 posted on 07/14/2003 1:23:09 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
ping
2 posted on 07/14/2003 1:23:48 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Let's keep the Dem's on the run!
Click the Pic!

3 posted on 07/14/2003 1:24:07 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Well don't worry. The story is now Wilson. It seems he is a "Bush hater" and not 100 percent behind the President. Thus everything he says is a lie. Funny how Clinton folks would point out that their critics were "Clinton Haters" while they ignored the facts as well.
4 posted on 07/14/2003 1:38:10 AM PDT by Burkeman1 (If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
Wilson started under Carter. His report, if you'd only read carefully, never made it up the ladder.

Can't you at least attempt to see beyond your Bush hatred, even once in a while ? :^)

5 posted on 07/14/2003 1:42:01 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
This guy would interst me if it weren't for the fact that the administration already conceded two days ago that the uranium/Niger story was BS. The piling on is just idiocy. And I don't hate Bush.
6 posted on 07/14/2003 1:46:36 AM PDT by Burkeman1 (If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
The administration did no such thing ! That is the lefty media's inyrpritation of what was said.

We've had several threads, on all of this, for the past several days.

I haven't ever seen you NOT bash Bush, dear. LOL

7 posted on 07/14/2003 1:49:49 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
The story is now Wilson. It seems he is a "Bush hater" and not 100 percent behind the President. Thus everything he says is a lie.

Yes, Wilson now is part of the story, and his backround is relevant.

How do you reconcile that it's reported that President Bush never saw Wilson's report, yet Wilson talks about the Bush team "misrepresenting the facts," and asking, "What else are they lying about?"

Which "facts" are being ignored?

8 posted on 07/14/2003 1:51:08 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Bush has denied the intel of his own CIA on the Niger story. Tenent just took the blame for it. Of course the Brits still contend they have the goods. I am missing something?
9 posted on 07/14/2003 1:53:24 AM PDT by Burkeman1 (If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
You're missing quite a lot, actually. Go read the thread about the French NOT telling us about uranium sales from Africa.
10 posted on 07/14/2003 1:54:49 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Kind of cute how the author came up with this oh so fine research, yet somehow managed to avoid touching on any of those details.

"Mr. Lifesayer" was such a fine upstanding US official, that he continued his fine service by leaking intel to the press... even to the point of actually penning his own article. That's NOT responsible behavior, it's egotistical behavior.

If he genuinely thought his report's - make that alleged report since it doesn't seem he made one- his report's value was overlooked or ignored and felt that dangerous, he should have sought some other internal way to address the issue. But as an individual who isn't even in government anymore, he wasn't in a position to know what other intelligence said on the matter. He had no "need to know."

I'm still not convinced he actually went to Niger as his self-written article dwelt rather long on trying to set the stage like some sort of travel brochure; it read like he was making a sales pitch.

And what's this with the wife, a supposed "Agency" WMD operative? Valerie Plame? Why would any self-respecting weapons specialist marry a Goron? Since when do CIA staff e send out their own non-CIA spouses on info-gathering vacations?

Is her name Valerie Plame, or Valerie Wilson, or Valerie Plame-Wilson?

11 posted on 07/14/2003 1:55:47 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Ask Tenent and Bush's National Security advisors? CIA still claims that Bush's team knew of their skepticism. Tenent just lamely took the blame for "not pulling the lines" as if he had any major role in reviewing or writing the SOTU speech!
12 posted on 07/14/2003 1:56:15 AM PDT by Burkeman1 (If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
This guy would interst me if it weren't for the fact that the administration already conceded two days ago that the uranium/Niger story was BS. The piling on is just idiocy

He did no such thing .. there are SEVERAL threads here at FR the last few days .. try reading them and the actual text of what they said

13 posted on 07/14/2003 1:56:31 AM PDT by Mo1 (Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Links? First I have heard of a French connection.
14 posted on 07/14/2003 1:58:03 AM PDT by Burkeman1 (If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The Bush administration has said they included lines that were based on false intel. They have conceded that point.
15 posted on 07/14/2003 1:59:32 AM PDT by Burkeman1 (If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
Sorry, I am an HTML moron and don't do links. Just look at the threads. :-)
16 posted on 07/14/2003 2:02:37 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
Ask Tenent and Bush's National Security advisors?

No, I'm asking you.

How do you reconcile that it's reported that President Bush never saw Wilson's report, yet Wilson talks about the Bush team "misrepresenting the facts," and asking, "What else are they lying about?" Which "facts" are being ignored?

17 posted on 07/14/2003 2:04:14 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
Just pinged you to the thread and stop getting your drawers in a twist over a big fat nothing. :-)
18 posted on 07/14/2003 2:05:32 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Howlin; Miss Marple; Dog
Does Novak have a problem in researching the actual facts?

But I will say .. this is new .. I wasn't aware Wilson's wife sent him or worked at the agency

Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him. "I will not answer any question about my wife," Wilson told me.

19 posted on 07/14/2003 2:06:10 AM PDT by Mo1 (Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
The Bush administration has said they included lines that were based on false intel. They have conceded that point.

No they said it was based on questionable intel ..

There is a difference

20 posted on 07/14/2003 2:08:24 AM PDT by Mo1 (Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson