The story is now Wilson. It seems he is a "Bush hater" and not 100 percent behind the President. Thus everything he says is a lie. Yes, Wilson now is part of the story, and his backround is relevant.
How do you reconcile that it's reported that President Bush never saw Wilson's report, yet Wilson talks about the Bush team "misrepresenting the facts," and asking, "What else are they lying about?"
Which "facts" are being ignored?
Ask Tenent and Bush's National Security advisors? CIA still claims that Bush's team knew of their skepticism. Tenent just lamely took the blame for "not pulling the lines" as if he had any major role in reviewing or writing the SOTU speech!