Posted on 07/14/2003 1:23:09 AM PDT by kattracks
WASHINGTON -- The CIA's decision to send retired diplomat Joseph C. Wilson to Africa in February 2002 to investigate possible Iraqi purchases of uranium was made routinely at a low level without Director George Tenet's knowledge. Remarkably, this produced a political firestorm that has not yet subsided.
Wilson's report that an Iraqi purchase of uranium yellowcake from Niger was highly unlikely was regarded by the CIA as less than definitive, and it is doubtful Tenet ever saw it. Certainly, President Bush did not, prior to his 2003 State of the Union address, when he attributed reports of attempted uranium purchases to the British government. That the British relied on forged documents made Wilson's mission, nearly a year earlier, the basis of furious Democratic accusations of burying intelligence though the report was forgotten by the time the president spoke.
Reluctance at the White House to admit a mistake has led Democrats ever closer to saying the president lied the country into war. Even after a belated admission of error last Monday, finger-pointing between Bush administration agencies continued. Messages between Washington and the presidential entourage traveling in Africa hashed over the mission to Niger.
Wilson's mission was created after an early 2002 report by the Italian intelligence service about attempted uranium purchases from Niger, derived from forged documents prepared by what the CIA calls a "con man." This misinformation, peddled by Italian journalists, spread through the U.S. government. The White House, State Department and Pentagon, and not just Vice President Dick Cheney, asked the CIA to look into it.
That's where Joe Wilson came in. His first public notice had come in 1991 after 15 years as a Foreign Service officer when, as U.S. charge in Baghdad, he risked his life to shelter in the embassy some 800 Americans from Saddam Hussein's wrath. My partner Rowland Evans reported from the Iraqi capital in our column that Wilson showed "the stuff of heroism." President George H.W. Bush the next year named him ambassador to Gabon, and President Bill Clinton put him in charge of African affairs at the National Security Council until his retirement in 1998.
Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him. "I will not answer any question about my wife," Wilson told me.
After eight days in the Niger capital of Niamey (where he once served), Wilson made an oral report in Langley that an Iraqi uranium purchase was "highly unlikely," though he also mentioned in passing that a 1988 Iraqi delegation tried to establish commercial contacts. CIA officials did not regard Wilson's intelligence as definitive, being based primarily on what the Niger officials told him and probably would have claimed under any circumstances. The CIA report of Wilson's briefing remains classified.
All this was forgotten until reporter Walter Pincus revealed in the Washington Post June 12 that an unnamed retired diplomat had given the CIA a negative report. Not until Wilson went public on July 6, however, did his finding ignite the firestorm.
During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, Wilson had taken a measured public position -- viewing weapons of mass destruction as a danger but considering military action as a last resort. He has seemed much more critical of the administration since revealing his role in Niger. In the Washington Post July 6, he talked about the Bush team "misrepresenting the facts," asking: "What else are they lying about?"
After the White House admitted error, Wilson declined all television and radio interviews. "The story was never me," he told me, "it was always the statement in (Bush's) speech." The story, actually, is whether the administration deliberately ignored Wilson's advice, and that requires scrutinizing the CIA summary of what their envoy reported. The Agency never before has declassified that kind of information, but the White House would like it to do just that now -- in its and in the public's interest.
©2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
From one of his handy little bios...
One of the biggest reasons the hostages were released is because of the political backlash after Mr. Hussein had his picture taken while patting terrified hostage kids on the head... the scene didn't play any better in Paris than it did in Peoria.
Not to mention the guy the press originally credited with gaining their release was Jessie Jackson. People have been padding his resume with that too.
Maureen Dowd would be proud at how many in the media are handling this .. it's right up her ally
But you are more than willing to blast President Bush while admitting not knowing about the timeline or Wilson.
I know that very dubious info was put into the SOTU speech and that it is alleged that members of Bush's staff were made aware that this info was dubious by the CIA.
Alleged by the very same man you admit you don't know about. Claims made by the Dems, who are basing their claims on what Wilson has said.
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
Bear in mind that the Brits have intel other than the documentation about Niger that was proven false after the SOTU address.
How many countries in Africa have uranium besides Niger?
Would the government or the mining company officials tell Joe Wilson, a known employee of the US Government, that they had sold uranium to Saddam?
I also find it interesting that Pincus wrote a story in the Washington Post, apparently from information he gleaned from either Wilson or his wife (my take on what Novak said, anyway). This means someone wanted this story to come out during the African trip.
Now, I ask myself this: how appropriate is it for the husband of one of the CIA's WMD people to be agitating against the war and writing op-ed pieces in the papers?
Novak shared Wilson's views against the war and perhaps that is why he "missed some important points."
Regardless of timelines, or who knew what about Wilson and his report, there has never been a statement by Bush or any administration source that said Iraq had purchased or obtained in some other fashion uranium, from Niger or any other locale. The record shows that the statement(s) in question all profess the exact same idea: at some point, Iraq sought to obtain uranium. Their success, or lack thereof, in doing so is not pertinent now and it wasn't then.
If a killer is searching for a weapon to murder you, yet is encountering difficulty finding one, it doesn't make him any less dangerous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.