Skip to comments.
Mission to Niger
TownHall.com ^
| 7/14/03
| Robert Novak
Posted on 07/14/2003 1:23:09 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Wilson's report that an Iraqi purchase of uranium yellowcake from Niger was highly unlikely was regarded by the CIA as less than definitive, and it is doubtful Tenet ever saw it. Certainly, President Bush did not, prior to his 2003 State of the Union address,.... The story, actually, is whether the administration deliberately ignored Wilson's advice, ....
How could the administration have ignored Wilson's advice if they never saw his report?
Report: CIA Source on Niger Nuke Flap is a Bush-Hater (Wilson)
1
posted on
07/14/2003 1:23:09 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: William McKinley
ping
2
posted on
07/14/2003 1:23:48 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: All
Let's keep the Dem's on the run!
Click the Pic!
3
posted on
07/14/2003 1:24:07 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: kattracks
Well don't worry. The story is now Wilson. It seems he is a "Bush hater" and not 100 percent behind the President. Thus everything he says is a lie. Funny how Clinton folks would point out that their critics were "Clinton Haters" while they ignored the facts as well.
4
posted on
07/14/2003 1:38:10 AM PDT
by
Burkeman1
(If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
To: Burkeman1
Wilson started under Carter. His report, if you'd only read carefully, never made it up the ladder.
Can't you at least attempt to see beyond your Bush hatred, even once in a while ? :^)
5
posted on
07/14/2003 1:42:01 AM PDT
by
nopardons
To: nopardons
This guy would interst me if it weren't for the fact that the administration already conceded two days ago that the uranium/Niger story was BS. The piling on is just idiocy. And I don't hate Bush.
6
posted on
07/14/2003 1:46:36 AM PDT
by
Burkeman1
(If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
To: Burkeman1
The administration did no such thing ! That is the lefty media's inyrpritation of what was said.
We've had several threads, on all of this, for the past several days.
I haven't ever seen you NOT bash Bush, dear. LOL
7
posted on
07/14/2003 1:49:49 AM PDT
by
nopardons
To: Burkeman1
The story is now Wilson. It seems he is a "Bush hater" and not 100 percent behind the President. Thus everything he says is a lie. Yes, Wilson now is part of the story, and his backround is relevant.
How do you reconcile that it's reported that President Bush never saw Wilson's report, yet Wilson talks about the Bush team "misrepresenting the facts," and asking, "What else are they lying about?"
Which "facts" are being ignored?
8
posted on
07/14/2003 1:51:08 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: nopardons
Bush has denied the intel of his own CIA on the Niger story. Tenent just took the blame for it. Of course the Brits still contend they have the goods. I am missing something?
9
posted on
07/14/2003 1:53:24 AM PDT
by
Burkeman1
(If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
To: Burkeman1
You're missing quite a lot, actually. Go read the thread about the French NOT telling us about uranium sales from Africa.
To: kattracks
Kind of cute how the author came up with this oh so fine research, yet somehow managed to avoid touching on any of those details.
"Mr. Lifesayer" was such a fine upstanding US official, that he continued his fine service by leaking intel to the press... even to the point of actually penning his own article. That's NOT responsible behavior, it's egotistical behavior.
If he genuinely thought his report's - make that alleged report since it doesn't seem he made one- his report's value was overlooked or ignored and felt that dangerous, he should have sought some other internal way to address the issue. But as an individual who isn't even in government anymore, he wasn't in a position to know what other intelligence said on the matter. He had no "need to know."
I'm still not convinced he actually went to Niger as his self-written article dwelt rather long on trying to set the stage like some sort of travel brochure; it read like he was making a sales pitch.
And what's this with the wife, a supposed "Agency" WMD operative? Valerie Plame? Why would any self-respecting weapons specialist marry a Goron? Since when do CIA staff e send out their own non-CIA spouses on info-gathering vacations?
Is her name Valerie Plame, or Valerie Wilson, or Valerie Plame-Wilson?
11
posted on
07/14/2003 1:55:47 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: kattracks
Ask Tenent and Bush's National Security advisors? CIA still claims that Bush's team knew of their skepticism. Tenent just lamely took the blame for "not pulling the lines" as if he had any major role in reviewing or writing the SOTU speech!
12
posted on
07/14/2003 1:56:15 AM PDT
by
Burkeman1
(If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
To: Burkeman1
This guy would interst me if it weren't for the fact that the administration already conceded two days ago that the uranium/Niger story was BS. The piling on is just idiocy He did no such thing .. there are SEVERAL threads here at FR the last few days .. try reading them and the actual text of what they said
13
posted on
07/14/2003 1:56:31 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
To: nopardons
Links? First I have heard of a French connection.
14
posted on
07/14/2003 1:58:03 AM PDT
by
Burkeman1
(If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
To: Mo1
The Bush administration has said they included lines that were based on false intel. They have conceded that point.
15
posted on
07/14/2003 1:59:32 AM PDT
by
Burkeman1
(If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
To: Burkeman1
Sorry, I am an HTML moron and don't do links. Just look at the threads. :-)
To: Burkeman1
Ask Tenent and Bush's National Security advisors? No, I'm asking you.
How do you reconcile that it's reported that President Bush never saw Wilson's report, yet Wilson talks about the Bush team "misrepresenting the facts," and asking, "What else are they lying about?" Which "facts" are being ignored?
To: Burkeman1
Just pinged you to the thread and stop getting your drawers in a twist over a big fat nothing. :-)
To: kattracks; Howlin; Miss Marple; Dog
Does Novak have a problem in researching the actual facts?
But I will say .. this is new .. I wasn't aware Wilson's wife sent him or worked at the agency
Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him. "I will not answer any question about my wife," Wilson told me.
19
posted on
07/14/2003 2:06:10 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
To: Burkeman1
The Bush administration has said they included lines that were based on false intel. They have conceded that point. No they said it was based on questionable intel ..
There is a difference
20
posted on
07/14/2003 2:08:24 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson