To: MEGoody
I guess I'm not being clear.
I just was trying to emphasize the difference between 1 found, getting all this attention, and the others that merely slipped under the "media's" radar.
I'm GLAD that there are STILL people who are upset set over each individual victim; just that it appears hopeless to try and get MAINSTREAM Media (liberal college trained) to feel anything about it other than another snippet of sensationalized data.
111 posted on
07/14/2003 12:52:16 PM PDT by
Elsie
(You can't HANDLE the truth!)
To: Elsie
I guess I'm not being clear. no you're not! you're sounding like you assume no one thinks anyone other babies died that day, and that you want to get rid of any law that doesn't prevent crime... (which would be all of them)
Let people be sad for this baby. don't use this dead baby to make people feel guilty.
118 posted on
07/14/2003 1:55:45 PM PDT by
KneelBeforeZod
(If God hadn't meant for them to be sheared, he wouldn't have made them sheep.)
To: Elsie
There should be a place to go on the internet to find the info.
You know how they have a section in the paper for announcements Marraige/obits?
A section on horrific deaths like this published would accomplish showing the whole picture.
Maybe even include runaways ect found tossed away like left over scraps.
Ya think that would help?
Remember when they started publishing "Johns" who were caught soliciting prostitutes in order to maybe curb men from going out seeking. Something like that.
136 posted on
07/14/2003 9:53:21 PM PDT by
oceanperch
(Confession is good for the soul, oops I boasted again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson