To: jlogajan
Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered.
5 posted on
07/12/2003 11:34:06 AM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Pukin Dog
Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. Perhaps they should have checked, rechecked and checked again before commutting American troops.
To: Pukin Dog
My problem with this approach is that they are putting too much faith in American public. If Bush takes a hard-hit on the issue of credibility between now and next Auguest, I'm not sure releasing WMD info would overturn the trend.
This just doesn't sound right to me, too risky, too close to the election day.
13 posted on
07/12/2003 11:43:05 AM PDT by
Schakaljager
(no fan of tags)
To: Pukin Dog; PhiKapMom; hoosiermama; Ragtime Cowgirl; Scenic Sounds; Mo1
POTUS is taking a lot of media heat --- I doubt that he'd sit on WMD's until next August. If accurately reported, Mc Inerney's statement does bring to mind, FNC's WH reporter, Jim Angle's statement that the "Bush WH is the most secretive" he's covered. Don't know how many WH's he's covered? 41's and the anti-Christ's perhaps?
18 posted on
07/12/2003 11:45:15 AM PDT by
onyx
(Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
To: Pukin Dog
The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered.At the gates of Baghdad?
24 posted on
07/12/2003 11:47:39 AM PDT by
Sir Gawain
(My other tagline is a Porsche)
To: Pukin Dog
Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered.Sweet!
Like the time Clintonistas were all huffy about accusations of mayhem while vacating the Hoar House. The Bushies gave them just enough rope, then released details.
To: Pukin Dog
Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered.I agree. They have been criticizing him for jumping the gun. How could they also criticize him for cautiously rechecking before making an announcement? Of course, we know they will try to hang him on it, but the noose will be on their own necks.
46 posted on
07/12/2003 12:04:09 PM PDT by
Faith
To: Pukin Dog
Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered. Absolutely. Look what happens when one line from the SOTU speech isn't 100% verifiable. a full week of 'rats calling Dubya a "liar" and nearly demanding his impeechment.
Dubya better make sure any evidence of WMD is 100% accurate. If that means he needs to hold off announcing we found them until mid summer next year I sure won't blaim him.
47 posted on
07/12/2003 12:04:18 PM PDT by
Once-Ler
(I vote Dubya)
To: Pukin Dog
Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered. I don't disagree .. but to wait till next August?
I don't think they'll wait that long
54 posted on
07/12/2003 12:09:13 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson