Bush may be sitting on Iraqi WMD evidence, FOX analyst says

Jerusalem Post ^ | Jul. 10, 2003 | Erik Schechter

[Pukin Dog]

Someone needs to tell him to shut up. The rope-a-dope is working like a charm so far.

[jlogajan]

Actually, if Bush did that, it would backfire as being too much game playing. He campaigned on being "transparent", and not all this backroom intrigue stuff.

[Support Free Republic]

Hi Mom!

[Pukin Dog]

Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information. The Dems can scream all they want, they will be slaughtered.

[alrea]

"The credibility of CNN went way down"

CNN had very little credit when the "war" started

[AHerald]

...former Army general Wesley Clark, who is now running for the Democratic presidential nomination...

Huh? When did Clark enter the race?

[Cacophonous]

Bush can argue that they wanted to be totally accurate and complete with their WMD report. Therefore they checked, rechecked and checked again, before releasing the information.

Perhaps they should have checked, rechecked and checked again before commutting American troops.

[McGavin999]

Actually, I expect next summer to be pretty exciting with a number of revelations and accomplishments. It's going to be fun to watch.

[new cruelty]

ROTFLOL

[ApesForEvolution]

If indeed Bush is sitting on WMD evidence and properly solidifying his case, that would be a great move.

Anything brought to the public now would be ill-timed and if it wasn't thoroughly proven accurate, it would have horrific impact.

[Schakaljager]

My problem with this approach is that they are putting too much faith in American public. If Bush takes a hard-hit on the issue of credibility between now and next Auguest, I'm not sure releasing WMD info would overturn the trend.

This just doesn't sound right to me, too risky, too close to the election day.

[Pan_Yans Wife]

I think that is a really LONG time to wait for the WMD evidence to come out. Politically, it might be a coup, but with the domestic agenda starting to nag at people's consciences, the truth of the WMD coming out in 2003, will bolster the argument that national security has been and will continue to be the number one priority of the Bush administration.

[Cacophonous]

So that's going to be your response to Dems? I don't know...short, doesn't answer the question, doesn't add anything new to the debate, an ad hominen attack, rude...just like a liberal. It suits you.

But I think President Bush better have a different response handy.

[KCmark]

What a great argument. You really showed him.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Good shot!

[onyx]

POTUS is taking a lot of media heat --- I doubt that he'd sit on WMD's until next August. If accurately reported, Mc Inerney's statement does bring to mind, FNC's WH reporter, Jim Angle's statement that the "Bush WH is the most secretive" he's covered. Don't know how many WH's he's covered? 41's and the anti-Christ's perhaps?

[ApesForEvolution]

Yeah, relying on the UN's inspector clouseaus, that were kicked out of ChIraq, and had previously been duped time and again by the stalinist Sodom butcher regime. Good one.

[MJY1288]

What did our American troops do wrong for them to need a "Commutting" :-)