Skip to comments.
Pro-Infanticide Prof Awarded Ethics Prize
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com ^
| 7/12/2003
| © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
Posted on 07/12/2003 9:15:30 AM PDT by YoungKentuckyConservative
Princeton's Peter Singer advocates killing disabled after birth.
A controversial professor who advocates killing the disabled up to 28 days after birth, has been honored with an international ethics award.
Peter Singer, professor of bioethics at Princeton University, has been given the 2003 World Technology Award for Ethics by the World Technology Network.
The organization says its members are dedicated to the business and science of emerging technologies such as biotechnology and new energy sources.
"I am delighted to have been selected by my peers as a winner of the 2003 World Technology Award in the ethics category," Singer said in a statement issued by the university.
"The fact that the World Technology Network has an ethics award at all is a recognition of the importance of keeping ethics in mind as we move forward with new technologies in a wide variety of fields, from genetics to computing," he said.
The awards, announced at the World Technology Summit in late June, honor individuals and corporations from 20 technology-related sectors selected by their peers as innovators.
When Singer was hired by Princeton in 1999, a group calling itself Princeton Students Against Infanticide issued a petition in protest, charging the Australian professor "denies the intrinsic moral worth of an entire class of human beings newborn children."
"His assertion of the appropriateness of killing some humans based on others' decision concerning the "quality" of their lives should strike fear into everyone who cherishes equality and honors human life," the petition said.
The group called the hiring a "blatant violation of Princeton University's policy of respect for people with disabilities."
Singer also is known for launching the modern animal rights movement with his 1975 book "Animal Liberation," which argues against "speciesism."
Singer insists animals should be accorded the same value as humans and should not be discriminated against because they belong to a non-human species.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; animalrights; award; ethics; infanticide; peter; petersinger; princeton; prize; singer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
So it is ethical to spare "all" animals, but then murder "unacceptable" humans that don't pass Mr. Singer's litmus test? Interesting and illogical.
To: All
2
posted on
07/12/2003 9:18:34 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
Hitler, as we all know was an ethicist himself, would be proud.
3
posted on
07/12/2003 9:20:20 AM PDT
by
beaversmom
(Celebrating May 5th and all days with an American Flag)
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
This is absolutely sick. Singer is a madman.
What is the World Technology Network anyway? Does anybody have any info. on them?
4
posted on
07/12/2003 9:26:20 AM PDT
by
bourbon
(I've had an octopus squirting on my brain for a fortnight!!)
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
Singer holds common, garden-variety liberal beliefs but shocks us by taking them to their logical conclusion. What he advocates is what's in the dark, God-hating soul of all American liberalism.
5
posted on
07/12/2003 9:43:03 AM PDT
by
T'wit
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
What isn't noted in this piece concerning animal "rights" is his favoring sex with animals.
6
posted on
07/12/2003 9:44:15 AM PDT
by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered....)
To: JoJo Gunn
Where is PETA when they are needed most?
Princeton could have hired Stan Hauerwas. He is a serious ethicist and pro-life.
7
posted on
07/12/2003 9:48:16 AM PDT
by
sine_nomine
(I am pro-choice...the moment the baby has a choice.)
To: JoJo Gunn
"What isn't noted in this piece concerning animal "rights" is his favoring sex with animals."
Well, at least that would spare the offspring. This man is a lunatic, the mere fact that he is at Princeton, PRINCETON! shows how far the world has descended into the muck since the 1960's.
8
posted on
07/12/2003 9:50:22 AM PDT
by
jocon307
(The sooner my generation dies off, the faster the world will improve)
To: jocon307
Well, at least that would spare the offspring. This man is a lunatic, the mere fact that he is at Princeton, PRINCETON! shows how far the world has descended into the muck since the 1960's. While I agree, I think we better accept the fact that it is the US of A that is descending.
9
posted on
07/12/2003 9:57:58 AM PDT
by
mad puppy
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
Scientific ethics has been appropriated by the scientists and is now the sole purview of the "ethicists", subset of scientists whose task it is to discuss conventional ethics and find them wanting.
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
"The fact that the World Technology Network has an ethics award at all is a recognition of the importance of keeping ethics in mind as we move forward with new technologies in a wide variety of fields, from genetics to computing," he said. We have now entered the Twilight Zone. When an amoral fiend like Singer is honored for his ethics, doublespeak is now the common tongue.
To: sine_nomine
To the scientist, a pro-life perspective is a failing generally held by moralists.
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
I can't believe this!
BTW, he was on C-Span the other day, talking about the book he's written about his grandparents dying during the holocaust. I think one grandparent survived. His parents had emigrated to Australia.
He must "have (unresolved) issues" about mankind's control of life and death. He wants to have the final say about who dies first.
He's an inmate in charge of the asylum, put in charge by a bunch of nuts. Some of his speaking venues have been very appropriate.
[Dissenting-voices] Fw: Peter Singer/Eva Cox
Tuesday, 18th February, 7:00pm sharp The Valhalla: Cinema 2, 166 Glebe Point Rd, Glebe, 2037 Peter Singer author of "Pushing Time Away: My Grandfather and the Tragedy of Jewish Vienna" In conversation with Eva Cox
"Pushing Time Away", is a very personal history by the man described in The New Yorker as 'the most influential living philosopher, Australian Peter Singer.
The question of Singer
February 1 2003 Peter Singer will talk to Arnold Zable about his memoir at the Comedy Club, 380 Lygon Street, on February 24. Tickets 9347 6633.
13
posted on
07/12/2003 10:08:14 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Why DO liberals keep describing one other as THOUGHTFUL individuals?)
To: bourbon
From their home page:
http://www.wtn.net/new/about/index.html About THE WORLD TECHNOLOGY NETWORK
The World Technology Network (WTN) is a cross between a global meeting ground, a virtual think tank, and an elite club whose members are all focused on the business or science of bringing important emerging technologies of all types (from biotech to new materials, from IT to new energy sources) into reality. WTN's membership is comprised of over 700 individuals and organisations from over 50 countries judged by their peers to be the most innovative in the technology world.
WTN brings key players together from the most cutting-edge technologists to the most forward-thinking financiers, from the most conceptual futurists to the most grounded entrepreneurs, from the most insightful science writers to the most savvy marketers, from the most big-picture government officials to the most focused policy analysts, and from the world's leading corporations to the world's newest start-ups helping to make things happen sooner and better than they might have.
WTN exists to "encourage serendipity" the happy accidents of colliding ideas and new relationships that cause the biggest breakthroughs for individuals and institutions. WTN works to accomplish its mission through global and regional events for its members (and others) to help make connections amongst them, and to examine the likely implications and possible applications of emerging technologies. WTN also seeks to provide useful information and provoke action through its publications.
The World Technology Awards are presented each year to the outstanding innovators from each sector within the technology arena, both as a way to honour those individuals and as a vetting process to determine the newest WTN members. The Awards are announced each year in a gala ceremony at the close of the annual World Technology Summit.
The World Technology Summit is a global gathering of the WTN membership as well as other delegates. The 2001 World Technology Summit was held in London at Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine and the National Museum of Science & Industry. The 2002 World Technology Summit was held in New York City, in part at United Nations headquarters, and in association with Nasdaq, Cisco Systems, Intel, Novartis, TIME magazine, Red Herring magazine, Science magazine/American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), and the International Herald Tribune (published with the New York Times and the Washington Post). The 2003 World Technology Summit and Awards will take place June 24th and 25th in San Francisco in association with NASDAQ, Accenture, Microsoft, Genencor, DuPont Textiles & Interiors, TIME, Science/AAAS, Technology Review, and Business 2.0. To register or for more information click here.
In 2002, WTN launched a digitally-distributed magazine as its first publication: World Technology Intelligence. Available at no cost both to WTN members (automatically) and others (by subscription), "Intelligence" contains both news about WTN members' work as well as various features mostly written by WTN members in their own words.
WTN also organises chapter meetings and roundtables in key cities around the world where WTN membership has achieved a local critical mass. WTN is also exploring the development of other online and offline services.
WTN is a community for and of those people, working in and around new technologies, who are creating the future and changing the world.
14
posted on
07/12/2003 10:11:42 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Why DO liberals keep describing one other as THOUGHTFUL individuals?)
To: pram
Didn't they treat Dr. James Watson like a God also since his DNA discovery in 1954 with Francis Crick? He's just as vile, yet held in high regard by the left. Sick!!!
To: YoungKentuckyConservative; Cacique; Black Agnes; Coleus
animals should be accorded the same value as humans and should not be discriminated against because they belong to a non-human species.So does that mean we can treat you, Professor, the same as a West Nile virus mosquito?
To: syriacus
"
WTN brings key players together from the most cutting-edge technologists to the most forward-thinking financiers......"Pretty proud of themselves, aren't they? Gonna be interesting to see how they answer to God one day.
To: bigfootbob
People who have decided to be enemies of God - due to their envy - cannot create life, since only He does that. So in their jealousy and anger they are attracted to death and destruction. Like rebellious children, they want to destroy since they cannot create. Even scientists who create this or that do it with the building blocks or energy and natural laws that God has already created.
People like Singer take it to the extreme in theory, people like Hitler put it into practice. The abortion industry and its promoters are other examples.
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
Woe unto those who call good, "evil, and evil, "good."
19
posted on
07/12/2003 10:36:25 AM PDT
by
Faith
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
We are doomed.
20
posted on
07/12/2003 10:53:16 AM PDT
by
joybelle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson