Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK Scientists Eye Half Mile-Long Microscope
Reuters ^ | July 11, 2003 | Pete Harrison

Posted on 07/11/2003 9:26:20 AM PDT by AntiGuv

LONDON (Reuters) - British scientists are lobbying to build the world's most powerful microscope, an instrument so advanced that it can see individual atoms moving.

The European Spallation Source (ESS) -- a type of instrument known as a matterscope -- would allow them to look at the growth of protein molecules in living human tissue or at the stresses deep within the wheel of a train or the wing of an aircraft.

"This is on par with the Hubble telescope, but it's for looking at inner space," said Professor Bob Cywinski of Leeds University, which is backing the one billion pound project.

A disused World War II airfield in North Yorkshire has been earmarked for the matterscope's 0.62 mile-long concrete tunnel and neutron research laboratories.

"To look at it, you'd just see a mound of grass growing over the top and sheep wandering around," said Cywinski.

Rather than using light to look at microscopic structures, matterscopes use neutrons -- bouncing them off the surface just as bats or dolphins use sound waves to create the image of an object.

The neutrons are created by using powerful magnets to propel protons down the concrete tunnel at nearly the speed of light. At the end, they hit a metal target, chipping off neutrons, which can be focused into a beam.

Meetings with Science Minister Lord Sainsbury this month have shifted the proposal up a level, said Cywinski, and it now looked like a real possibility. "We've cleared the first hurdle," he told Reuters.

Britain already has the world's most powerful matterscope, of 200 kilowatts, at the Rutherford Appleton laboratory in Oxfordshire, he said, but the United States and Japan are about to eclipse it.

It will be dwarfed by a 1.5 megawatt Spallation Neutron Source in Tennessee, and by Japan's one megawatt J-Parc, both of which should be ready around 2006.

"The Americans are going to leapfrog Rutherford Appleton using a European design," said Martin Doxey of the White Rose consortium, which links the universities of Sheffield, Leeds and York to the project.

"What this is about is taking a more modern European design to leapfrog them," he added. "It's not a macho thing. It's not a 'mine is bigger than yours' thing. To do the next generation of experiments, we simply need the bigger beam."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: crevolist; microscope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2003 9:26:21 AM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
UK Scientists Eye Half Mile-Long Microscope

Wow. Where are they going to find anyone with arms long enough to put the slides under the lens? (I know. I know. It's Friday.)

2 posted on 07/11/2003 9:30:31 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/11/2003 9:31:12 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Looking for Slick's Willie?
4 posted on 07/11/2003 9:51:49 AM PDT by MonroeDNA (You guys ROCK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Just thought some on your ping list may find this of interest.
5 posted on 07/11/2003 9:54:26 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
This is on par with the Hubble telescope, but it's for gazing at our navels.

Sorry. Couldn't resist -- they're Europeans, after all.

(steely)

6 posted on 07/11/2003 9:59:53 AM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
Ping to half the list.
7 posted on 07/11/2003 12:47:44 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Which half would that be? and how long before the thread gets trashed.
8 posted on 07/11/2003 12:52:03 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Cool stuff, thanks for the ping PH.
9 posted on 07/11/2003 12:56:20 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
... neutrons, which can be focused into a beam.

OK, I give up. How do you focus neutrons?

10 posted on 07/11/2003 12:59:59 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
How do you focus neutrons?

Must be some kind of mechanical device.

11 posted on 07/11/2003 1:00:49 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"Very carefully."
12 posted on 07/11/2003 1:01:46 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Virginia-American; Iota; What is the bottom line; whattajoke; ASA Vet; Da_Shrimp; metacognative; ...
Second half of ping list.
13 posted on 07/11/2003 1:04:28 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
How different is this from a conventional neutron beam, like the one at Brookhaven? As I remember, with a neutron beam you bombard a target, then analyze the heck of the scatter pattern to figure out what it is telling you. I gather this new thing is more like a microscope.
14 posted on 07/11/2003 1:07:53 PM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rustbucket
I notice that on the main FR page, this is listed as post 14 of 13. Most of the other numbers are wacked also.
15 posted on 07/11/2003 1:09:45 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
How does one focus neutrons? I understand focusing electrons and protons, but there doesn't seem to be anything to "grab onto" with a neutron.
16 posted on 07/11/2003 1:10:54 PM PDT by Junior ("Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment and okay for you...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
That went away in a hurry. I suppose I was just hallucinating.
17 posted on 07/11/2003 1:12:11 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Very cool! But I take it we shouldn't look forward to seeing any photographs that'll be taken by these things, is that right?
18 posted on 07/11/2003 1:15:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
They might be powerful, but not as powerful as the 6.21 Jigawatt Flux Capacitor.
19 posted on 07/11/2003 1:18:03 PM PDT by Guillermo (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
If you pass a 2-way mirror over a photocopier, while at the same time observing it through the Hubble telescope from the objective lense.....

.....waitaminute, I've lost my train of thought....

20 posted on 07/11/2003 1:24:38 PM PDT by dogbrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson