Posted on 07/11/2003 4:37:42 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
The big news on the demographic front is a report from the U.S. Census Bureau that Hispanics - at 39 million strong - have surpassed blacks as the nation’s largest minority group. Demographers have known this for some time but were waiting for an official pronouncement. Perhaps the most important news from the Census report is a stat that most reporters overlooked: from 2000 to 2003 Hispanics accounted for half the national increase of the U.S. population.
Hispanics make up the bulk of our legal and illegal immigrants, and already comprise a majority or near majority in cities such as Miami, Denver, Houston, San Antonio and Los Angeles. They will soon comprise the majority in much of the American Southwest. If immigration and birth rates continue as they are (and there is no reason to think they won’t) we could well see the creation of an American Quebec.
Whether or not this will happen depends on the ability of the United States to integrate the newcomers into the mainstream of American society. Historically, learning English has been the key to assimilation for new immigrants. If this is used as a measurement, then the melting pot is clearly broken. The 2000 Census found that 21.3 million Americans (8%of the population) are classified as "limited English proficient," a 52% increase from 1990, and more than double the 1980 total. More than five million of these people were born in the United States.
The U.S. government makes it easy for immigrants to function in their native languages through bilingual education, multilingual ballots and driver’s license exams, government funded translators in courts, schools and hospitals, and a multitude of other programs. Providing most essential services to immigrants in their native languages is not only expensive for American taxpayers, it serves to keep immigrants linguistically isolated.
We need only look to Canada to see the problems a multilingual society can bring. America’s northern neighbor faces a severe crisis over the issue of language. In 1995, the predominately French-speaking province of Quebec came within a few thousand votes of seceding from Canada. The secessionist Parti Quebecois ruled the province until this year. The national government must continually cater to Quebec to preserve order and maintain a cohesive government. This has spurred secessionist movements in English speaking Western Canada on the grounds that the Canadian government favors French speakers.
It is clear that many French-speaking Canadians do not feel any attachment to Canada or to their English-speaking countrymen. During the 1998 Nagano Olympics, Francophone Quebec athletes telephoned their members of the National Assembly to complain that all of the Canadian flag waving in Canada's athletes' residence was damaging their spirit and therefore hurting their ability to compete. Skier Jean-Luc Brassard complained that his poor performance was due to having to see the flag paraded up and down his hallway every time Canada won a medal. He also said that he regretted being the flag-bearer for Canada during the opening ceremonies.
Battles over language rage across the globe . However, since Canada is so similar, it offers the most instructive warning for the United States. While the policy of official multilingualism has led to disunity, resentment and near secession, it is also very costly. Canada's dual-language requirement costs approximately $4 billion each year. Canada has one-tenth the population of the United States and spent that amount accommodating only two languages. A similar language policy would cost the United States much more than $4 billion a year as we have a greater population and many more languages to accommodate.
Unless the United States changes course, we are clearly on the road to a Canadian style system of linguistic enclaves, wasteful government expenses, language battles that fuel ethnic resentments and, in the long run, serious ethnic and linguistic separatist movements. What is at stake here is the unity of our nation. Creating an America- style Quebec in the Southwest and other "linguistic islands" in other parts of the United States. will be a disaster far exceeding that of the Canadian problem. We now have over eight percent of the population that cannot speak English proficiently. What happens when that number turns to 25% that cannot speak English at all?
Declaring English to be the official language of the United States government would bring back the incentive to learn English. A bill in Congress would make this a reality. The "English Language Unity Act," H.R. 997, was introduced earlier this year. The bill already has 74 co-sponsors and is starting to make some waves on the talk radio circuit. If it passes, we can start to rebuild the American assimilation process and lessen the amount of linguistic separation in the United States. If it fails, we might have lost the last best chance for a sensible and cohesive language policy in this country. If that happens we can say hasta la vista to the "United" States and Adelante to Canadian style discord over the issues of language and ethnicity.
2 posted on 3/6/02 7:30 AM Pacific by grammymoon:
"What would you do Without FR?
How would You Feel without FR?
Suppose one day you tried to log on and Free Republic wasn’t there?
Where would you get your up to the minute news? How about the live threads as things are happening?
How would you know about the latest Demorat scams, anti-second amendment schemes and all the other liberal, anti-American ploys that are tried every single day?
Insight into world affairs, brilliant wit, sharp retorts, instant information gratification are a few of the things that make FR so vital.
How would you keep on top of things without FR?
How would you know who to contact to complain about the lying politicians, Media Bias, Hollyweirds latest mouth off, sponsors of these idiots, company policies that are unfair and all the other things we need to know to counteract the liberal mindset and the evil plans of liberals?
How would you be part of a Freep?
What would you do without FR????
Freedom isn’t free.
If you enjoy the site and find it a place of like minded Americans to sound off, to get together, to fight back, to have your voice heard and make a difference,PLEASE CONTRIBUTE NOW ! Donate Here By Secure Server
Jim can’t do this alone.
The liberals are sure we won’t be able to keep FR up & running. Prove them wrong. Show them we are indeed united Freepers. Whether it is $5.00, $50.00 or more, it all adds up. Please send a donation now to Free Republic.
El cielo está cayendo
I have no idea what that means
The basic premise of this statement is flawed. The secessionist movement in Quebec is based more on economic differences than on differences in language. What you are seeing in Canada is nothing more than a clash between competing versions of socialism -- the nanny-state version that predominates among less ambitious people like the French and the "milder" Anglo-Saxon version that you see in Germany and Great Britain.
The basic problem for Quebec is that their nanny-state economic model cannot survive on its own -- it requires permanent financial support from the outside to fuel its burgeoning demands for revenue. Hence, it will be a cold day in hell before Quebec ever secedes from the rest of Canada -- in fact, if that 1995 referendum had been passed by the voters of Quebec, the separatist party leadership would have demanded a recount to stave off what would have been the demise of Quebec.
The secessionist movement is driven by language and cultural identity issues. I do agree though that they will never separate because Quebec is not economically viable on it's own.
The "language and culture" issue is nothing more than a tool that is used to dupe the average moron on the street in Montreal into thinking that "the Anglos" are somehow a threat to his existence. This leads to the idiotic notion in Quebec that a successful French-speaking professional from Chateauguay somehow has more in common with a French-speaking Muslim who just washed up on the shore from Algeria than he does with a successful English-speaking professional from the west end of Montreal.
That is my whole point; the language and culture issue is what is driving the secessionist movement, not economics. That it is a tool to 'dupe the average moron' is irrelevant.
I don't understand who is doing the 'duping' though. Is it the government of Quebec, is it the intelligensia, or some secret cabal that manipulates public opinion? And how are they covering up their true agenda, which you suggest is to maintain a socialist state. If the socialist state they want cannot sustain itself without the rest of Canada, why are the 'average morons' being duped into wanting a separate state???
The goal of the "separatist" leadership is not secession, but a credible threat of secession without actually going through with it. They need dupes to carry this out.
This "secessionist" movement is nothing more than a tool to extract financial concessions from the Canadian government to help pay Quebec's bills. Something along the lines of this: "We'll keep our secessionist threats to a minimum if you provide Bombardier with the contract to build new buses for the capital city of Ottawa."
The secessionist leadership in Quebec has actually used this kind of strategy on behalf of the Quebec dairy cartel. Did you know that by law something like 40% of all the milk sold in Canada must come from Quebec dairy farms? There's no way in hell those dairy farmers would ever give up that cash cow by seceding -- but they have to constantly threaten to secede just to keep the cash flowing.
Pardon my confusion, I now understand completely where you are coming from on this, and I believe you are 100% correct.
Mmmmm. That reminds me of the half pint (250 ml?) of Quebon milk I had with my breakfast one 1975 morning at the Queen Elizabeth on Blv. Dorchester (now Blv. Rene-Levesque). :-)
Also slightly off topic, my paternal grandfather (who died earlier in 1975) came to Chester, PA from Ukraine - via none other than Montreal. Apparently never picking up a syllable of francais.
le foreverfree
What constitutional grant of power would Congress be acting under in this instance?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.