[Southack]

Let's keep this to one thread, preferably to one topic, shall we.

Just post the actual legal text of the Patriot Act (or other Acts if you absolutely must) that you feel is unconstitutional, and I'll be happy to debtate it with you.

But until you are willing to debate the actual legal text, I'll continue to mock your attempts at digression, among other such humorous antics.

[tpaine]

"You see, you can take the actual legal text from any of those laws that you mention, and I'll be happy to debate the Constitutionality of any particular sentence, passage, paragraph, section, or entire document."
-hack-


I posted, as an example, an FR article showing that many US Congressmen have severe doubts about the constitutionality of the banking act, only one of those 'laws that I mentioned'.

Now you say, "Let's keep this to one thread, preferably to one topic, shall we."


You have a big 'thing' about thinking you can control the argument, don't you?
Confronted with irrefutable facts, you insist upon ignoring them.

Silly tacic, as it destroys your credibility, just as I and others noted earlier.

[Constitutionalist Conservative]

Let's keep this to one thread, preferably to one topic, shall we.

By "one topic", do you mean something like the original topic of this thread? :-)