To: Southack
Southack wrote: I was merely trying to avoid endless digressions. Your mileage may vary
You are merely trying to avoid digressions as to why you defend an 'Act' repugnant to our constitution, imo.
515 posted on
07/11/2003 11:37:30 PM PDT by
tpaine
(Your mileage may vary, depending on foot in mouth disease)
To: tpaine
"You are merely trying to avoid digressions as to why you defend an 'Act' repugnant to our constitution, imo."
You are welcome to continue this debate in my email. My intention was to keep the clutter on this thread to a minimum, as such clutter is frequently used by those losing intellectual arguments as an excuse for changing the subject.
I need no such distraction or digression. Perhaps others do.
520 posted on
07/11/2003 11:43:24 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson