[tpaine]

Southack wrote: I was merely trying to avoid endless digressions. Your mileage may vary


You are merely trying to avoid digressions as to why you defend an 'Act' repugnant to our constitution, imo.

[Southack]

"You are merely trying to avoid digressions as to why you defend an 'Act' repugnant to our constitution, imo."

You are welcome to continue this debate in my email. My intention was to keep the clutter on this thread to a minimum, as such clutter is frequently used by those losing intellectual arguments as an excuse for changing the subject.

I need no such distraction or digression. Perhaps others do.