To: ApesForEvolution
"I've read it many times, marked up a couple copies, and I find it troubling. It is an issue. Why is it not troubling to you?"
I've neither claimed that it is or isn't "troubling", probably because "troubling" is a much lower standard than "unConstitutional".
My beef is with those who claim that the Patriot Act is unConstitutional, especially those who can't even post the specific legal text with which they have said issue.
491 posted on
07/11/2003 11:06:09 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
"My beef is with those who claim that the Patriot Act is unConstitutional, especially those who can't even post the specific legal text with which they have said issue."
At which point has the 4th Am. been stretched to the point it's broken?
Recent USSC 'compelling governmental diversity interests' rulings - were they 'stretching' or did they 'break' the Constitution?
497 posted on
07/11/2003 11:11:08 PM PDT by
ApesForEvolution
("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
To: Southack
BTW, I would like to see how you quote the thousands of pages of text known as the "Patriot" Act without your copy in front of you.
498 posted on
07/11/2003 11:13:28 PM PDT by
ApesForEvolution
("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson