Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MJY1288; mware
I hope that you all will email a local talk radio host in the New Orleans area about this. I emailed him already, but one email can easily be overlooked.

David Tyree, tyree@wwlmail.com, went on and on today about the Niger forgery. He's a generally good guy and he was sincerely concerned that perhaps there's something to the Bush Lied garbage that has been floating around.

I also emailed him this link, http://famulus.msnbc.com/FamulusIntl/reuters07-09-083034.asp?reg=MIDEAST, about Blair stating that there was more info about the Niger-Iraq nuclear link which was independent of the forged document.

If anyone does e-mail him, please keep the tone respectful. Tyree is an honest man. His position is that he wants to trust the president, but he's having a hard time considering the news about the forgery, etc.

Thanks.
426 posted on 07/09/2003 8:43:01 PM PDT by alnick (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]


To: alnick
No matter what the situation is on the intel on the Niger forgery it really doesn't matter, he stated in the SOTU speech these words:

"The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb. The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production. Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide."

We found out that he did have much to hide.... Howbout parts of his nuclear program under his scientist Rose garden

443 posted on 07/09/2003 8:53:58 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

To: alnick
I receive a daily broadcasting newsletter and they have cited an article in The Los Angeles Times today:

High Stakes In Government Feuds With BBC
The British and Israeli prime ministers both claim the broadcaster is unethical and reckless.
By William Wallace
Special to The Los Angeles Times

LONDON -- With its dulcet tones and extensive reach into the synapses of the nation, the British Broadcasting Corp...

I won't post the entire article here because of restrictions with the LA Times (reading their online version of the paper requires that you sign up, for one thing), but here's a little snippet that in a way relates to the topic of this thread.

For his part, Blair contends the BBC did nothing less than "lie" when it ran reports suggesting that Downing Street manipulated British intelligence information last fall in order to - as the BBC report put it - "sex up" the case for war with Iraq.

Facing persistent criticism over the failure to uncover the banned weapons on which he largely based his case for war, Blair said he could not allow claims of doctoring intelligence information to go unchallenged.

447 posted on 07/09/2003 8:57:03 PM PDT by arasina (Blankety Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

To: alnick
Here is the case for war, and no matter how the rats and others spin it, this is the reason for removing Saddam from power and all this other garbage is just detractors nit picking the tiniest of details

"Year after year, Saddam Hussein has gone to elaborate lengths, spent enormous sums, taken great risks to build and keep weapons of mass destruction. But why? The only possible explanation, the only possible use he could have for those weapons, is to dominate, intimidate, or attack.

With nuclear arms or a full arsenal of chemical and biological weapons, Saddam Hussein could resume his ambitions of conquest in the Middle East and create deadly havoc in that region. And this Congress and the America people must recognize another threat. Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications, and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda. Secretly, and without fingerprints, he could provide one of his hidden weapons to terrorists, or help them develop their own.

Before September the 11th, many in the world believed that Saddam Hussein could be contained. But chemical agents, lethal viruses and shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those 19 hijackers with other weapons and other plans -- this time armed by Saddam Hussein. It would take one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known. We will do everything in our power to make sure that that day never comes"

Saddam was given 12 years to honor the agreements he signed in 1991 and he didn't. He doubted the resolve of this President and he made a big mistake

456 posted on 07/09/2003 9:02:56 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

To: alnick
I had emailed him when I first saw the retraction. I emailed him a simple link to the article and a summary of the fraud.

I hope he notes it as I'm sure hundreds if not thousands of people walked away from the show yesterday believing the anti-Bush caller.

To his credit Tyree did dismiss the caller's claim saying he'll wait till a credible source runs with it. I also believe he downplayed the Wilkinson claim of the caller until he saw some type of verification that the guy isn't lying.
493 posted on 07/09/2003 9:36:51 PM PDT by Bogey78O (Clinton lied....people died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson