Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD
Capitol Hill Blue ^
| July 9, 2003
| Doug Thompson
Posted on 07/09/2003 4:04:00 PM PDT by Doug Thompson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720, 721-740, 741-760 ... 1,321-1,340 next last
To: Miss Marple
The recent revelations are as disturbing as anything I've pondered about the Democrats (excepting Clinton's treason).
The "loyal opposition" seems to be something of a long-ago America.
I truly fear for my country now.
To: William McKinley; PhiKapMom; Miss Marple; onyx; habs4ever; MJY1288; Registered; Doug Thompson
Thank you, William - and for your #122 letter to Japan Today. The press is overdue for a BIG DOSE of accountability from 'we the people'.
***
Dear Freepers, Doug was right about one article very damaging to the Democrats. Check the date, remember the war coverage. I've been forwarding this to press and pols and friends for weeks. Now, Doug prints an article with a damnable headline, and then finds out his 20-year source is bogus?
It wouldn't be the first time a person backpeddled to save themselves - or their family. It happened for over 24 years in Iraq. It happens in other nations led by Organized Crime leaders daily.
It this article wasn't based on real DNC talking points, Mr. Thompson had ESP:
- How I Was Smeared ~ Harry Stein's eye-opening personal account (revenge of the VLWC media).
722
posted on
07/10/2003 7:41:49 AM PDT
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
(We're in a global war on terrorism..If you want to call that a quagmire, do it. I don't.*Rummy* 6-30)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
You have posted exactly what I have been saying on this thread. Believe the Clinton DemocRATs are behind this anti-Bush campaign with their lapdogs in the media. Letters to the editor in my paper all have the same Anti-Bush spin.
Article after article has anonymous sources quoted on things I know are bogus about this White House and DoD. How many times as SoS Colin Powell had to say the article was wrong he didn't say that but yet it was in quotes in an article.
I used to think it was sloppy journalism -- but no more -- it planned and when something dirty is happening to Republicans look no further that the Clintons who control DNC with an iron fist -- especially Hillary!
That 20-year scam doesn't pass the smell test IMO.
723
posted on
07/10/2003 7:46:41 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: MeeknMing
Bizarre to say the least. I've been following this story and thinking it through. Thanks for the ping.
To: scott7278
Thanks! The more I think about this the more convinced I am that Doug Thompson and his anonymous source now with a name are the tip of the iceberg.
725
posted on
07/10/2003 7:59:35 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: RedBloodedAmerican
You knew this con 20 years and had no idea about him? Either you're lying, or are gullible beyond belief. I don't think you are that gullible.Bullseye! ;-)
"I will track this guy down." - Doug Thompson
To: PhiKapMom
If you asked me, I would say that Bob Schrum and Carville are behind this with Bubba's input. This is a typical Carville smear job
727
posted on
07/10/2003 8:01:42 AM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: YaYa123
Add to the mix that Doug trips up on the spelling of Wilkinson ... where Doug's "source" said that he wants to go public with his WH meeting, Doug spells his name as "Wilkinsson" ... otherwise, it reads throughout as "Wilkinson" ... must be the trauma of typing out his "apology" ...
728
posted on
07/10/2003 8:02:39 AM PDT
by
Pegita
To: Doug Thompson
I respect someone who is big enough to admit that he made a mistake.
729
posted on
07/10/2003 8:02:50 AM PDT
by
jpl
To: PhiKapMom
That 20-year scam doesn't pass the smell test IMO.
I disagree. My ex was a news person. The are overworked and are under constant pressure from deadlines to produce. They often have trusted source people and/or "borrow" from other news sources just to meet the deadline and fill the space.
Any one who is familiar with these tactics could (and often do) set themselves up as "a reliable source". Feed some true information intermixed with lies. (Isn't that how spies work?)
I do believe that there may be many planted sources working against and weakening our government (not just Bush). What better way than through the news media. (a fifth column at work) We find it easy to attach the news media, maybe we should be attacking their sources? The reporters become their puppets.
Twenty years to use a person is not unbelievable.
730
posted on
07/10/2003 8:05:22 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Prayers for all)
To: PhiKapMom; Ragtime Cowgirl
Let me ask you something... Which is more of a scandal, that the Democrats are using talking points to advance their agenda, or that the Republicans haven't made effective use of talking points in the last eight-plus years?
To: Redleg Duke
Morons like you are a dime a dozen, even in the suck. Was it too taxing for your brain to read further into the thread than post #11 or are you just in line to sit under Doug's desk while he phones his friends?
Doug claimed his innocence. Kudos to you for loving his mia culpa.
Read on lemming or go sign up as a liberal.
To: Doug Thompson
I stand down, awaiting the goodies. :-)
Thank you for the response.
213 posted on 07/09/2003 9:15 PM EDT by JoeSixPack1 (POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
732
posted on
07/10/2003 8:06:08 AM PDT
by
JoeSixPack1
(POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
To: windchime
Told my daughter this morning that I need one of those big blackboards on the wall to keep track of all of this! There are so many links on here that need kept in one location.
The puzzle pieces are numerous but I would bet when it is finished, it will point right at Hillary Clinton and her stooges. The Clinton DemocRATs want Pres Bush attacked and brought and brought down. It is not going to work, but they are getting nastier and nastier.
Too many anonymous names turning up with quotes from closed meetings. Not a lazy press corps -- rotten press corps comes to mind that will spin anything for the Clinton DemocRATs. Bet the number of journalist with ethics is very small these days. Remember that Hillary goes back to Watergate where that investigative arm would leak damaging information and some of it turned out to be false. She got her start with a corrupt bunch of people and she has taken corruptness to new heights IMHO!
Someone should design a fashionable tin foil hat instead of the pointy one! You are right -- plenty of us are going to be wearing them.
733
posted on
07/10/2003 8:06:20 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: JoeSixPack1
Way to go! The more you read Doug's "apology" the more the stench rises!
734
posted on
07/10/2003 8:07:40 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: PhiKapMom
his anonymous source now with a name are the tip of the iceberg.
YES I believe you are correct. The reason the dems have gotten by with so much is they know how to manipulate the media. But they ARE not the only ones who have used it. I believe AC is on to something with SLANDER and TREASON. If we could just combine those two premises. Bias may equal spies.
Let's hope the media starts cleaning their own house.
735
posted on
07/10/2003 8:10:21 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Prayers for all)
To: PhiKapMom
It just all doesn't add up. I too smell a clintonian rat.
736
posted on
07/10/2003 8:12:10 AM PDT
by
JoeSixPack1
(POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
To: Sabertooth
The problem with the RAT Talking Points is that they are mostly lies! I have seen some of them. Truth and their talking points are not friends.
I don't think the GOP has done a good job at all of getting our talking points to the public for everyone to use. I get email of fact sheets to use in defending the President on a wide variety of issues but they need wide distribution.
That's why we post RNC Research articles and started Countdown to Victory '04 for the grassroots. It allows some of that information to get publicized.
Believe that RNC has taken giant leaps forward in the last few years. In 2000, I was part of a group asking the RNC Reps to oust Nicholson during the primaries. I refused to give them any money in 2000 and donated direct to the campaign because I thought they were so bad.
Give you an example -- we put up a thread on here about suggestions for campaign ads for Bush-Cheney because the ones they had were rotten and if you saw the ones that didn't make it -- they were even worse. I sent almost 100 pages of suggestions to Bush-Cheney in Austin and to RNC. Received the nicest letter back from Austin which I shared on here and received zero, zip, nada from RNC.
Now RNC is catching up! And I will guarantee you that the new site for Bush-Cheney -- the permanent one that will be launched shortly will have all kinds of information for us to use to spread the message. 2004 is going to be a whole lot different and you can take that to the bank.
737
posted on
07/10/2003 8:15:28 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: JoeSixPack1
I used to joke when something went bad for Republicans or the Country that it was the Clintons fault -- I don't joke anymore. I believe it is true!
738
posted on
07/10/2003 8:16:19 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: TaxRelief
Hmm. According to that forum Doug Thompson is taking some "well-deserved" time off.
To: PhiKapMom
Yes, we have not used the media to get our message across. It's not the medias fault. It is the GOPs fault.
LLok how certain Dems hog the cameras! Many REP are much to polite and proper for that!
Let's use the news!
740
posted on
07/10/2003 8:20:06 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Prayers for all)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720, 721-740, 741-760 ... 1,321-1,340 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson