Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tricky Question for Democrats: When Is Open Season on One Another?
NY Times ^ | 7/9/03 | Adam Nagourney

Posted on 07/09/2003 3:44:24 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

Mr. Lieberman's uncertainty about how much to tangle with his opponents is hardly unusual in the Democratic presidential contest.

The early start and fast pace of the campaign has pressured all the candidates to get tougher and move more quickly than ever before, their aides said, defying the conventional practice of delaying criticism of other candidates for as long as possible. This is a result both of the crowded field and the unexpected dominance of a candidate none had taken seriously, former Gov. Howard Dean of Vermont, one target of Mr. Lieberman's undelivered shots.

This unsettled environment has dizzied the campaigns as they debate what to do and when to do it — essentially, a game of political chicken in which candidates wait for someone else to take the first shot. The result has been what could kindly be described as confused behavior by the candidates and their advisers.

Here in New Hampshire, Mr. Lieberman's most prominent state adviser, Richard N. Swett, a former congressman and ambassador to Denmark, tartly said his candidate had to start taking on his opponents if he wanted to get traction.

"There are nine candidates from which people need to choose, and I think it's going to be much more difficult for them to make those choices unless the distinctions are fairly and clearly defined," Mr. Swett said. "The candidates themselves have to be clearly distinguishing themselves from the pack. It's never too early."

Mr. Swett, reflecting the common wisdom among the campaigns, suggested that Dr. Dean was the candidate Mr. Lieberman should be pivoting off of to build up his own credentials.

"What I find interesting is that if you look at his record as governor, he was far more moderate and centrist in his approach," Mr. Swett said of Dr. Dean. "He seems to be swinging to the left for the sake of the primary. My feeling is if he's going to paint himself into that corner, it's going be difficult for him to emerge when we get to the general election."

Mr. Lieberman, though, did not seem to be quite with Mr. Swett's program. He turned up to talk about jobs at a cafe here this morning and set down on the table written remarks that warned Democrats against retreating to an "old, failed solution of big government programs for everything, or appearing weak on defense during times of world threat" in the election ahead.

It was the kind of statement that almost certainly would have won Mr. Lieberman a moment on the local television news. But someone had drawn a dark slash through the paragraph, and the words went unspoken.

Mr. Lieberman hardly seems alone in his uncertainty. At a meeting with voters in Concord this evening, Senator John Edwards of North Carolina attacked Mr. Bush with a bluntness that appeared to startle even some Democrats. "The truth is, he's a phony — he's a complete phony," Mr. Edwards said of the president.

But Mr. Edwards turned nice when pressed about his fellow Democrats. "I don't have a negative word to say about any of them," he said.

Mr. Edwards took that position tonight, but showed no such reluctance at a televised debate in South Carolina in May — a debate that was so contentious that the candidates, almost by consensus, sharply scaled back attacks that they feared would weaken whoever won the party's nomination. And Mr. Edwards's campaign, like others, has not been shy about distributing research to reporters noting inconsistencies in the records of his opponents.

Representative Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, for example, released a scorching attack on Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts for making "false claims" about Mr. Gephardt's health care plan in a televised interview. But Mr. Gephardt sent it out about 5 p.m. on July 3, just ahead of a three-day weekend.

While the candidates are all wary of being perceived as going on the attack too early, the temptation for taking on one's opponents, and doing it relatively soon, is as strong this year as ever, strategists for several candidates said.

The Democrats must not only compete for attention in a field of nine candidates, but also against the impression that they are fighting for a nomination that may not be worth having, given Mr. Bush's currently strong standing.

Mr. Lieberman's forum drew only one camera crew — which arrived late — and that was the rule, not the exception, during a weekend of campaigning by Democrats here.

Beyond that, there is Dr. Dean, whose early success is posing a real threat to several other candidates. Arguably, at least four of them — Messrs. Lieberman, Gephardt, Edwards and Kerry — would have an incentive to take him down a few pegs, before long.

As it is, among the many political rules Dr. Dean might have upended this year is the one about attacking: At least initially, he criticized his opponents without reservation for much of the year. An aide to one of the candidates who might attack Dr. Dean was quick to note this.

"Dean's been the only candidate so far who has been comfortable with engaging on a personal level," this aide said.

That, though was back in the days when Dr. Dean was the maverick. This weekend, even he seemed to be trying to restrain himself — though he was not entirely successful.

"Gephardt, Kerry, Edwards, Lieberman, they all voted for the war, they all voted for tax cuts," he said at one stop on Saturday.

Dr. Dean beamed as his audience applauded its approval.


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; democrats; lieberman; loserman; openseason; question; tricky
Which way is the wind blowing, Joe?


1 posted on 07/09/2003 3:44:25 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Keep Free Republic Rockin' 'Round The Clock!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 07/09/2003 3:44:57 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Pretty soon this will look like an Agatha Christie mystery...

And Then There Were None...

Synopsis
Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, enter the Democratic primary (are invited to a lonely mansion on Indian Island) at the urging of Terry McCaliffe (a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear). On the campaign trail (island they are cut off from everything but each other and) the inescapable shadows of their own past lives are exposed. One by one, the guests share the darkest secrets of their wicked pasts. And one by one, they withdraw (die...)
Where did I put that Reynolds Wrap?

3 posted on 07/09/2003 3:53:39 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Rabbit season! Duck season! Rabbit season! Duck season! Rabbit season! Duck season! Rabbit season! Duck season! Rabbit season! Duck season! Rabbit season! Duck season! Rabbit season! Duck season! Rabbit season! Duck season! Rabbit season! Duck season! Rabbit season! Duck season!
4 posted on 07/09/2003 4:28:32 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
LOL... We hapless citizens are going to be subjected to more side-splitting over the top campaign maneuvers here than ever before. I can't wait!!!
5 posted on 07/09/2003 4:37:22 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Support FRee Republic ..... http://www.DRAFTTOM.com ..... Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
How sad. Not even Adam Nagourney knows what kind of advice to give these midgets.
6 posted on 07/09/2003 4:43:49 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I'm waiting for John Kerry's people to drop the opposition research "bombs" they allegedly (well, according to Drudge) on Howard Dean. Since the bombs are doubtless either sexual or drug-related, it will be interesting to see how the Party that doesn't believe in "personal attacks on people's private behavior" reacts.
7 posted on 07/09/2003 7:04:41 PM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Democrats suffer from the "wimp" factor. They are spineless in dealing with one another, refuse to rein in one another's corruption, and demonstrate the same cowardice in dealing with the terrorist problem. In short, they are unfit to lead the country.
8 posted on 07/09/2003 7:57:05 PM PDT by jagrmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson