To: isthisnickcool
Maybe 2.2% of the US population wasn't enough to carry such a channel in the first place? Yea, yea, they say it 10% but it isn't.
As much as I've never bought the "10%" claim, I still can't quite believe the "2.2%" (though I don't think it much higher). In any case, the problem is that most homosexuals don't make their sexual orientation the center of their lives, and as such the only real audience for the channel is homosexuals who are so shallow that there's nothing to them but same-sex attraction. Some might make claims as to the proportions, but no one should be so stupid as to assume that EVERY homosexual defines themself entirely by their sexual orientation.
Especially after the idiots on the US Supreme Court gave this super minority special rights.
When and how did the USSC do that?
64 posted on
07/08/2003 7:36:00 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
To: Dimensio
When and how did the USSC do that?
I'll defer to someone named Ann Coulter. She is an expert on this area.
Q. What's your take on the Supreme Court's ruling that antisodomy laws are unconstitutional?
Gay sex may well be a mystery of life, but I'll be damned if I can find it in the Constitution.
72 posted on
07/09/2003 7:46:05 AM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(Liberals - Their neural synapses are corroded.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson