Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Erik Latranyi; DoughtyOne
First of all I don't think the NASA Director made any such statements the day of the disaster. The Shuttle Flight Director was highly skeptical that the foam incident was the "root cause." But I think you will find that the analysis that was done did indicate some damage was likely to have ocurred.
37 posted on 07/08/2003 7:41:19 PM PDT by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: ironman
I'll try to look into this later. There seems to be some conflicting memories of that and I'm not always dead on, so I'll take another look.
39 posted on 07/08/2003 7:44:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: ironman; Erik Latranyi; DoughtyOne
what crap - "First of all I don't think the NASA Director made any such statements the day of the disaster. The Shuttle Flight Director was highly skeptical that the foam incident was the "root cause." But I think you will find that the analysis that was done did indicate some damage was likely to have ocurred."

We have an engineering/science project here - not a clinton political lying press conference. He stood up there plain as day and dismissed the foam as a cause in the very first press conference.
45 posted on 07/08/2003 9:02:24 PM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson