Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1rudeboy
To: DoughtyOne

If "they pretty well dismissed it [foam damage]" by saying they will look at all possibilities, then your statement is accurate. In fact, that's the only way your statement is accurate.
26 posted on 07/08/2003 2:08 PM PDT by 1rudeboy


Well Rudeboy, for your version to be correct NASA officials would have to have been saying, "We thought the foam strike could have resulted in mission failure but didn't do a damned thing about it."  If that's your point of view, you're welcome to it.  I specificly remember them saying, we considered this and dismissed it as a danger to the mission.  That's what I said and I believe it to be accurate.

28 posted on 07/08/2003 3:37:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
I'm sorry, I thought you meant after the disaster. Before the disaster, your original statement is correct.
29 posted on 07/08/2003 4:02:25 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson