Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Is this a reliable source? The troubling thing is that Wilkinson, whoever he is, goes on the record claiming to have been present at briefings where Bush basically say to hell with the evidence, I'm going with my gut.

I hope for Bush's sake and the GOP's sake this guy Wilkinson is not credible. If he is, and if others back him up, then Bush is probably a very deep trouble.

1 posted on 07/08/2003 11:42:35 AM PDT by leftiesareloonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections

Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 07/08/2003 11:43:08 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
if others back him up, then Bush is probably a very deep trouble.

I agree. This could be Bush's Watergate. Seriously. And Capitol Hill Blue is a reputable mag. It's not the Weekly World News.

3 posted on 07/08/2003 11:45:26 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
it also appears to be a mis-writing or mis-reading of words. Remember the origin of this was an errant document produced by the British MI6. As I recall Tenet stood behind it, too, to the degree that it was supplied by the Brits and we trusted them, only to later discover it had been manufactured in Niger, apparently by an over-zealous intelligence source who wanted to get paid for something. I suspect this supposed White House participant is likely a Clintonista holdover that should be out on the street looking for a new job in the immediate future.
4 posted on 07/08/2003 11:46:36 AM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
I do hope this is bogus. Bush is doing the right thing in Iraq.
5 posted on 07/08/2003 11:46:38 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Clearly spinning an anti-Bush agenda. In his state of the union address the President mentioned that Britain had evidence of the Iraqi's trying to buy nuclear material from Nigeria.

Wouldn't want to offend the media by pointing out the FACTS tho.

6 posted on 07/08/2003 11:46:39 AM PDT by OldFriend ((BUSH/CHENEY 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
"He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."

Sorry, dude, but that doesn't qualify as a lie. It may be stupid and it may be reckless and pig-headed, but it's not a lie. And anyone who wants to prove "Bush lied" does not want this Wilkinson on the stand.

7 posted on 07/08/2003 11:46:44 AM PDT by big gray tabby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
He didn't "LIE". He made a false statement based on poor intelligence.
9 posted on 07/08/2003 11:48:32 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
The president's statement was incorrect because it was based on forged documents from the African nation of Niger,

This is hardly "lying."

13 posted on 07/08/2003 11:51:10 AM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Clinton bombed pharmacuetical plants based on Monica's underdesk performace. If Bush lied, well at least he
toppled one of the world's first class jerks in the process, and isn't that what we wanted? A president
with better reasons to bomb other countries than covering up Oval Office
sodomy?
14 posted on 07/08/2003 11:51:10 AM PDT by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Sounds like more straw grabbing by the Dims!

Dimwits!

15 posted on 07/08/2003 11:51:32 AM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Bush lied about Saddam wanting to get uranium or whatever for nukes? I don`t think so. Despite what Ari says, if anyone in their right mind doesn`t think Saddass wasn`t trying to get his mitts on nukes, then they ought to re-examine the history of this psycho. Now where are my donations?


16 posted on 07/08/2003 11:51:53 AM PDT by metalboy (Liberals, what a dictator needs most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Bush did not lie. He said the British told him the Iraqis were obtaining nukes. That was the truth. They did tell him that.
17 posted on 07/08/2003 11:52:04 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Who cares? I mean, honestly.. Is the world better off with or without Hussein in power there? I'd say without.

QED
18 posted on 07/08/2003 11:52:18 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
You must have posted this in memory of a recently departed freeper who just loved this kind of story.
20 posted on 07/08/2003 11:52:34 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Sadly, from their perspective, no one reads "Capitol Hill Blue."
21 posted on 07/08/2003 11:52:43 AM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Um....I don't see a "lie" here.

This article is pure spin.

22 posted on 07/08/2003 11:52:56 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Is this a reliable source? The troubling thing is that Wilkinson, whoever he is, goes on the record claiming to have been present at briefings where Bush basically say to hell with the evidence, I'm going with my gut. I hope for Bush's sake and the GOP's sake this guy Wilkinson is not credible. If he is, and if others back him up, then Bush is probably a very deep trouble.

Here's what I don't get: If you sit in on top secret natinal security meetings, are you really allowed to just go out and blab about them to the press?

25 posted on 07/08/2003 11:53:45 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Capitol Hill Blue is fun to read, but so are Marvel Comics.
31 posted on 07/08/2003 11:55:18 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
Bush did not Lie!!! He repeated false information from British Intelligence. That is not lying. Get it straight guys and gals.
34 posted on 07/08/2003 11:56:20 AM PDT by mict42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
C'mon! Think about it.

The title of this piece is a lie in itself.

Did Thompson provide a quote from the White House saying Bush lied? No, of course not. Why? Because there wasn't one.

CHB is well known for it's leftie leanings.

But in his favor, at least he does provide a name this time, most of his stories cite "unnamed sources" just like the NY Slimes.
37 posted on 07/08/2003 11:58:36 AM PDT by Spidey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson