Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tolerating Evil Is No Longer Tolerable
The Washington Dispatch ^ | 7/7/03 | Patrick Rooney

Posted on 07/08/2003 12:49:10 AM PDT by abigail2

Tolerating Evil Is No Longer Tolerable

Exclusive commentary by Patrick Rooney

July 7, 2003

I went to see a fireworks show on July fourth. No patriotic music or words, just twenty minutes of moderately interesting visual pyrotechnics. No one seemed to mind. Masses of people thought nothing of building their day around the fireworks, bringing barbeque, drink, and children, and enduring major traffic, crowds, and weary legs. For what, exactly?

I pondered fireworks, gutted of their symbolic meaning, as I went to bed. Course I didn’t get to sleep right away. There’s something about the periodic boom of nearby M-80s that has a way of well, waking you up. As I lay awake, I began to reflect on the perversion of July 4th. Fireworks, once meant to celebrate our freedom, are too often just another distraction for the bored, or worse, one more bludgeoning tool for the corrupt. I reflected further, and realized that just about everything good in America has been fashioned into a weapon to beat down our gates.

The law is a perfect example of this. Once it protected good and punished evil.

But in America today, according to the Supreme Court’s thirty-year-old ruling, you can legally kill an unborn child. In fact, you can “make a killing”—ching, ching—by killing children. If I were to defend this “right”, I’d be considered a hero, standing up for “women’s rights”. Now if I were to try to prevent such a killing by attempting to stop an abortion “doctor” or “patient” from killing a baby, I would go to jail. And needless to say, be written off as a right wing fascist.

In America today, according to the recent ruling of the Supreme Court, there is now a right to sodomy. If I were to defend this right, I’d be considered a human rights advocate. And if I refused to hire a sodomite or rent an apartment to a “gay” couple, I could be in big legal trouble. And of course I’d be called a Nazi.

Somewhere along the line contemporary society got this notion that we are more compassionate, more loving than our narrow forefathers. After all, they allowed slavery, killed animals, and smoked cigarettes.

So we became lenient with the guilty. More “humane” with the worst among us. And necessarily we became more harsh with the innocent.

Today we have a Republican President. A Republican majority in the House and Senate. A supposedly “conservative” Supreme Court. A growing army of conservative talk show hosts, authors, and columnists. And we’re losing ground. The federal government continues to grow, and our culture continues to spin out of control. Why?

Because we are too embarrassed to assert our morality. We have removed our morality from the national equation, thinking that it would be the polite thing to do, and we expected the same of our adversaries. But we did not count on the fact that they would act in bad faith, laughing at us as we backpedaled our values, and they gleefully inserted their amorality into the vacuum we left for them.

Evil is not fair. Evil is not just. Evil is not interested in a Mexican standoff. It’s a struggle to the death, and it’s about time we understood the commitment it will take to win. Our president understands this principle in the war on terror. He needs to understand that his attitude must be the same on every front, particularly our domestic security front. The time for politicking is gone. Politicking gets people killed in today’s world.

There is really only one way out. To realize the foolishness of our ways. To recognize the wisdom of our forefathers, that our “compassion” is merely leniency for evil, resulting in the dishonoring and ultimate dismembering of good.

America is a Christian nation. We are tolerant, yes, of the existence of other religions or no religion at all, but we can never be tolerant of evil.

Reclaiming our nation means reasserting our morality in every area of life: legal, medical, political, entertainment, and education. Particularly education. We are losing our young to the corrupt, and until that reverses, we will continue to suffer.

Tolerance for evil is clearly something we can no longer afford to tolerate.

Patrick Rooney is the Director of Special Projects at BOND, the Brotherhood Organization of A New Destiny, a nonprofit organization dedicated to “Rebuilding the Family By Rebuilding the Man.”

For more information, please visit www.bondinfo.org , call 1-800-411-BOND (2663), or write to feedback@washingtondispatch.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 4thofjuly; abortion; bond; evil; forefathers; good; hughhewitt; lawrencevtexas; scotus; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: gcruse
Using a paddleball is also a learned behavior. So what?

So if I'm a landlord and I don't want tenants playing paddleball in their apartments, it goes into the lease and if they violate it they're out on their butts.

They can come rent from you and you can play paddleball with them.

41 posted on 07/08/2003 9:34:00 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Yes, indeedy. You are right.
42 posted on 07/08/2003 9:36:07 PM PDT by abigail2 (Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
You're absolutely right. Businessmen should exercise their right to do business and employ anyone they want as well. Thanks.
43 posted on 07/08/2003 9:37:37 PM PDT by abigail2 (Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Okay, Kevie, make a lease prohibiting fags from renting your apartment, then tell me how Americans are all entitled to the same rights.
44 posted on 07/08/2003 9:39:32 PM PDT by gcruse (There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Americans are entitled to earn money and buy their own house or business and rent to whomever they want...
45 posted on 07/08/2003 9:40:54 PM PDT by abigail2 (Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
The individual's right to freely exercise his or her liberty is not dependent upon whether the majority believes such exercise to be moral, dishonorable, or wrong. Simply because something is beyond the pale of "majoritarian morality" does not place it beyond the scope of constitutional protection. To allow the moral indignation of a majority (or, even worse, a loud and/or radical minority) to justify criminalizing private consensual conduct would be a strike against freedoms paid for and preserved by our forefathers.

---The Georgia Supreme Court
46 posted on 07/08/2003 9:41:03 PM PDT by gcruse (There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: abigail2
Americans are entitled to earn money and buy their own
house or business and rent to whomever they want...


No, you are wrong.  You cannot discriminate based
on religion, for one thing, in renting out property.

47 posted on 07/08/2003 9:42:33 PM PDT by gcruse (There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
We have said that Congress may regulate not only 'Commerce…among the several states,'…but also anything that has a 'substantial effect' on such commerce. This test, if taken to its logical extreme, would give Congress a 'police power' over all aspects of American life.

Under our jurisprudence, if Congress passed an omnibus 'substantially affects interstate commerce' statute, purporting to regulate every aspect of human existence, the Act apparently would be constitutional. </>

Found this on your profile page. Justice Thomas went on to state that under the substantially affects interstate commerce test adopted by the Court, "[c]ongress can regulate whole categories of activities that are not themselves either 'interstate or commerce.'"

48 posted on 07/08/2003 9:44:49 PM PDT by abigail2 (Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: abigail2
Yup. Pretty frightening, innit?
49 posted on 07/08/2003 9:45:40 PM PDT by gcruse (There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
It's to the point that I would support anyone discriminating on any basis, any time, any where for any thing.

I am so sick of protected, minority classes burdening the majority.

Just, let everyone discriminate at will and keep government out of the picture, if this is the best they can do.

IMO, the Free market will pick up the slack.

50 posted on 07/08/2003 9:47:52 PM PDT by Jhoffa_ (BREAKING: Supreme Court Finds Right to Sodomy, Sammy & Frodo elated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: abigail2
***snore***
51 posted on 07/08/2003 9:49:24 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
That's right, discriminate against evil indiscrimately!
52 posted on 07/08/2003 9:53:54 PM PDT by abigail2 (Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Wake up then...
53 posted on 07/08/2003 9:54:37 PM PDT by abigail2 (Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: abigail2

Well, you could look at it that way.

I was thinking more along the lines of not forcing "evil" down peoples throats for the sake of "diversity".

I don't want to deal with tyranical minorities. It would eb so much easier to simply seperate my/our selves from them if we don't see eye to eye. WITHOUT SCOTUS handing down edicts to the contrary.

54 posted on 07/08/2003 9:58:04 PM PDT by Jhoffa_ (BREAKING: Supreme Court Finds Right to Sodomy, Sammy & Frodo elated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
No argument here. Although, discriminate we must.
55 posted on 07/08/2003 10:06:20 PM PDT by abigail2 (Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: abigail2
Somewhere along the line contemporary society got this notion that we are more compassionate, more loving than our narrow forefathers. After all, they allowed slavery, killed animals, and smoked cigarettes

They smoked unfiltered cigarettes no less. ;-)

56 posted on 07/08/2003 10:34:16 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
---The Georgia Supreme Court

That's a queer organization isn't it?

57 posted on 07/08/2003 10:37:49 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
we've got to win one more election before we're positioned to activate the spine we installed three years ago.

I hope and pray that you're right.

58 posted on 07/08/2003 10:46:26 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
---The Georgia Supreme Court
That's a queer organization isn't it?


Men in robes, if you know what I mean.
But, hey, the Georgia capitol dome is gold.
How gay is that?  The very name Georgia
reeks of girly-man.  It's everywhere, I
tell you.
59 posted on 07/08/2003 10:49:51 PM PDT by gcruse (There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Whatever consenting corn bores chose to do in their love life is no concern of an employer or a landlord.

Like spread disease, molest kids, jack up health costs, hate straights, etc?

60 posted on 07/08/2003 10:50:15 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson