Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shuttle Foam Test Yields Hole in Wing (Produces vs Yields)
AP ^ | 07/07/2003 | MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer

Posted on 07/07/2003 1:10:51 PM PDT by DoughtyOne

Science - AP

Shuttle Foam Test Yields Hole in Wing

59 minutes ago

By MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer

SAN ANTONIO - The team investigating the Columbia disaster fired a chunk of foam insulation at shuttle wing parts Monday and blew open a gaping 2-foot hole, offering dramatic evidence to support the theory of what doomed the spaceship.

The crowd of about 100 gasped and cried, "Wow!" when the foam hit.

The foam struck roughly the same spot where insulation that broke off Columbia's big external fuel tank during launch smashed into the shuttle's wing. Investigators believe the damage led to the ship's destruction during re-entry over Texas in February, killing all seven astronauts.

It was the seventh and final foam-impact test by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board, and it yielded by far the most severe damage.

The 1.67-pound piece of fuel tank foam insulation shot out of a 35-foot nitrogen-pressurized gun and slammed into a carbon-reinforced panel removed from shuttle Atlantis.

The countdown boomed through loudspeakers, and the crack of the foam coming out at more than 500 mph reverberated in the field where the test was conducted.

Twelve high-speed cameras — six inside the wing mock-up and six outside — captured the event. Hundreds of sensors registered movements, stresses and other conditions.

NASA (news - web sites) will continue gathering more information about the poorly understood pieces that line the vulnerable leading edges of shuttle wings, board member Scott Hubbard said.

One month ago, another carbon shuttle wing panel — smaller and farther inboard — was cracked by the impact, in addition to an adjoining seal. This time, the entire 11 1/2-inch width of the foam chunk — rather than just a corner during previous tests — hit the wing, putting maximum stress on the suspect area.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: caib; foam; hole; shuttle; test
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: El Gato
Kinda' like a punkin' chucker?
81 posted on 07/08/2003 3:42:02 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; XBob
Once again, NASA supported the RCC sections with glued on external struts. You can see them in all the pictures.

Why are they doing this? Are the RCC sections not attached via their normal hardware, or are they trying to protect the normal attach hardware because it is a known weak point and would fail in these tests, blowing away the entire RCC section?

82 posted on 07/08/2003 3:48:16 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Investment Biker
I recall a Freeper making an estimate it was around 500mph relative velocity, based on frame-rate of the high speed film.
83 posted on 07/08/2003 3:53:50 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
At the speed the shuttle was moving, a 500mph relative velocity is a small perctage of the shuttle's speed, and, IIRC, the shuttle was still accellerating at that point.
84 posted on 07/08/2003 3:57:55 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me
The shuttle was on main engine and booster power. So an aerodynamic flaw on the shuttle would be readily compensated for.
85 posted on 07/08/2003 4:10:25 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: american_ranger
Whoever it was, it's still a riot.
But the guy who related it to me had said the French were the guilty party.
But it matters not, it's still a darn good story.

At the time I had chalked it up to being a "pilot's story" except that it didn't begin with "There I was" or "No S**t!" like the normal stories from former soldiers.

I find the darn things design itself interesting, a round 'gun tube' that can launch a non-round chicken to 500 miles an hour or so. I'm guessing that's the same type of 'gun' the used to launch the foam at the shuttle wing section.
86 posted on 07/08/2003 4:36:49 AM PDT by Darksheare (The Borg, the IRS of Star Trek.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Budge
Thank you. That was a nice simple explanation. I fully understand now. I probably should have for XBob, but for some reason I just didn't understand what he was trying to say.
87 posted on 07/08/2003 9:04:29 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Brother, has your faith lapsed. Renew your conservatism today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Budge
BTW, I'll try your site again.
88 posted on 07/08/2003 9:06:16 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Brother, has your faith lapsed. Renew your conservatism today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
Thank you. Wish I could take credit for it. I'm just passing the info along. I am glad you found it interesting.
89 posted on 07/08/2003 9:11:05 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Brother, has your faith lapsed. Renew your conservatism today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
76 - "Budge's graphics" wouldn't load.

they are graphic images, not videos. click on the graphic pictures and a larger version will appear.
90 posted on 07/08/2003 9:36:05 AM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: XBob
Thanks for the directions. The problem was, the page stalled before any icons came on the screen. I had to kill Netscape twice just to regain control.
91 posted on 07/08/2003 9:54:02 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Brother, has your faith lapsed. Renew your conservatism today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
sounds like you have too many things running in the background on your computer.

get to a stopping point, where you have everything you need to have saved, and hit CTL-ALT-Del, and a list of what is running will come up. If you have Win98, there are only 2 programs necessary to be running in the background.

If you clean up your computer, it will run a lot faster and better.

a good site to go to is :

http://www.mycomputershow.com/

Ira Wilsker is excellent, and following his directions on cleaning up your startup will make your computer run markedly better.
92 posted on 07/08/2003 10:52:45 AM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: XBob
Thanks for the link.

It looks to me like the impact is on the RCC leading edge treatment. Just as in yesterday's tests.

93 posted on 07/08/2003 11:22:32 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Kinda' like a punkin' chucker?

Only sort of. It uses compressed nitrogen as the "propellant", not some combustable gases, In that way it's more like a giant paint ball gun.

94 posted on 07/08/2003 11:24:37 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Once again, NASA supported the RCC sections with glued on external struts. You can see them in all the pictures.

Are those supports, or an attempt to simulate the aerodynamic loading that would be present in flight? They look to me as if they would push on the RCC section, not support it.

95 posted on 07/08/2003 11:37:00 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
I'm guessing that's the same type of 'gun' the used to launch the foam at the shuttle wing section.

Yes, it is. The SwRI gun used in the tests is one modified from just such a Chicken Gun. The group which does the tests for NASA has long been involved in doing such impact tests on various structures.

96 posted on 07/08/2003 11:39:39 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
"I find it hard to believe that the foam slowed down enough to go from a delta-V of zero to 500 MPH in the short distance involved. Then again, it's hard to say without knowing the air density, shape of the chunk, and so forth."

We examined that from a physics / math perspective here . . .

Observation on TPS damage on Orbiter (Post 2440)

Observation on TPS damage on Orbiter (Post 2445)

97 posted on 07/08/2003 6:16:39 PM PDT by Resolute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fnord
"Do you have the math to show a 500 mph relative speed?"

See the links at reply #97, this thread.

98 posted on 07/08/2003 6:24:21 PM PDT by Resolute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
That's gotta have alot of volume of air/nitrogen or whatever they're using to be able to launch a non-tube conforming 'round' out of the tube.
Has to be an interesting design.
99 posted on 07/08/2003 6:24:59 PM PDT by Darksheare (The Borg, the IRS of Star Trek.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
The math supports what you said.
100 posted on 07/08/2003 6:27:11 PM PDT by Resolute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson