Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul-Independence from England, Dependence on Washington?
House Web Site ^ | Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)

Posted on 07/07/2003 10:43:50 AM PDT by jmc813

“Isn’t our choice really one of up or down? Down through statism, the welfare state, more and more government largesse, accompanied always by more government authority, less individual liberty and ultimately totalitarianism, always advanced as for our own good. The alternative is the dream conceived by our Founding Fathers, up to the ultimate in individual freedom, consistent with an orderly society.

We don’t celebrate Dependence Day on the Fourth of July. We celebrate Independence Day.”

Ronald Reagan

Ronald Reagan’s reminder that the Fourth of July is a celebration of independence, not dependence, still resonates today. We celebrate not only our political independence from England, but also our independence from the feudal notion of loyalty to King and Crown. We celebrate victory by the American colonies over a government that taxed them too much and sought too much control over their affairs. We also celebrate the Founding Fathers themselves, and the great principles contained in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

Today some Americans, including many members of Congress, view both the Constitution and our Founders as quaint anachronisms at best. Times have changed, they argue, and we hardly should be bound by rules established by a bunch of dead white men who could not possibly understand our modern society. The Constitution is relevant only if it “evolves” to allow for new realities, and the federal government certainly should not be constrained by outdated notions about its proper role. This viewpoint steadily gained acceptance throughout the 20th century, exemplified by the blatantly unconstitutional New Deal and Great Society programs, Supreme Court activism, the virtual abolition of states rights, and uncontrolled growth of the federal government.

In my opinion this perspective threatens the very foundation of American greatness. The principles enshrined in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence define the American way of life. Without those principles we become just another country, governed by whim and expediency, with no guiding vision beyond the ambitions of the latest politicians in power. The purpose of the Constitution was to impose systematic limits on government power, limits that survive the political tides.

We owe our Founding Fathers a tremendous debt of gratitude. They created a society based on the radical idea that the purpose of government was to protect the rights of the individual, preexisting rights granted by God rather than the state. For the first time in human history, a government was designed to serve the individual, rather than vice versa. This triumph of the individual over the claims of the state, the King, the collective, or society represents a great gift to humanity. The principle of a servant government is the ideal that made America the greatest nation on earth.

Those who dismiss the Constitution ignore the link between the wisdom of our Founders and the freedom and prosperity we still enjoy today. America is not prosperous and relatively free merely by accident. It is prosperous and free because we still retain vestiges of our constitutional system of limited government, with its emphasis on property rights and the rule of law. Other nations are similarly filled with bright, hardworking people, and enjoy abundant natural resources. Yet why have they not prospered like America? The simple reason is they enjoy less liberty. Without liberty and property rights, the human spirit diminishes. More freedom always means more prosperity, which is why American enjoys a much higher level of material well-being than almost any other nation.

As we celebrate the Fourth of July, we might consider what our Founders would think of present-day America. Would they find the ideal of a servant government intact? Would they see a society that abides by the principles established in the Constitution?

Unfortunately, the answer is no. They would discover a society completely dominated by the federal government, totally at odds with the weak central state they envisioned. They would find the people over-taxed, over-regulated, and far too dependent on government in every sphere of human activity. They would find most Americans woefully ignorant about our own history and Constitution, despite the prevalence of college degrees. Worst of all, they would find an attitude of complacency and subservience toward government, a mindset of accepting whatever Washington hands down.

And on this Fourth of July, they would outrageously find that fireworks displays all across the nation have been cancelled, because communities did not obtain federal licenses for handling explosives.

We can complain about how far we’ve fallen in 225 years, but that won’t make America a better place. Our challenge is to create an America that lives up to the principles and ideals of our Founding Fathers.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: independenceday; ronpaul; ronpaullist

1 posted on 07/07/2003 10:43:50 AM PDT by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
CWOJackson's favorite congressman ping

;-)

2 posted on 07/07/2003 10:45:02 AM PDT by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
"As we celebrate the Fourth of July, we might consider what our Founders would think of present-day America."

Yes, I can see George Washington turning to Ben Franklin with a puzzled and hurt look in his eyes, asking, "Ben, have you figured out how to make that light stop flashing on your VCR?"

3 posted on 07/07/2003 10:49:18 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
They created a society based on the radical idea that the purpose of government was to protect the rights of the individual, preexisting rights granted by God rather than the state. For the first time in human history, a government was designed to serve the individual, rather than vice versa.

Even some people who call themsleves "conservatives" can't seem to grasp this.

4 posted on 07/07/2003 10:49:19 AM PDT by HurkinMcGurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HurkinMcGurkin
They aren't Conservatives.
5 posted on 07/07/2003 10:51:43 AM PDT by Gary Boldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Good read.
6 posted on 07/07/2003 10:54:21 AM PDT by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Mega-Ron Paul-dittos.
7 posted on 07/07/2003 10:55:16 AM PDT by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Ron Paul List
ping
8 posted on 07/07/2003 11:01:40 AM PDT by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
bump.
9 posted on 07/07/2003 11:04:03 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Thank you for posting this. As usual Ron Paul is right on the mark!

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

10 posted on 07/07/2003 11:19:19 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Our challenge is to create an America that lives up to the principles and ideals of our Founding Fathers.

Not only our challenge, our duty.

11 posted on 07/07/2003 11:28:41 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
bump
12 posted on 07/07/2003 12:14:44 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree
One if by land
Two if by sea
three if they come
from Washington DC
13 posted on 07/07/2003 12:23:41 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Taxation with representation doesn't seem to be much of an improvement over taxation without representation.
14 posted on 07/07/2003 12:29:48 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HurkinMcGurkin
"They created a society based on the radical idea that the purpose of government was to protect the rights of the individual, "

I would offer that they were trying to limit the powers of the Federal government, but the State governments still had quite considerable power.
15 posted on 07/07/2003 12:30:41 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
"Taxation with representation doesn't seem to be much of an improvement over taxation without representation."

If only taxpayers were allowed to vote, it would be.
16 posted on 07/07/2003 12:32:12 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
Would you weight the votes by the amount of taxes paid?
17 posted on 07/07/2003 12:56:58 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
obviously my own suggestion has huge pitfalls as well.

Having a system where taxpayers are a minority or will soon been a minority among voters is a problem. Since taxation is legal, I don't have any brilliant solutions.
18 posted on 07/07/2003 1:46:43 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
bump
19 posted on 07/07/2003 2:00:44 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
They would discover a society completely dominated by the federal government, totally at odds with the weak central state they envisioned. They would find the people over-taxed, over-regulated, and far too dependent on government in every sphere of human activity. They would find most Americans woefully ignorant about our own history and Constitution, despite the prevalence of college degrees. Worst of all, they would find an attitude of complacency and subservience toward government, a mindset of accepting whatever Washington hands down.

Woeful ignorance, indeed.

Although, I'm inclined to say, it's deliberate ignorance that is born of apathy. People simply don't care. "Let the government take care of it", people say. Or, "There should be a law...". People don't understand that we have to keep the government under the governance of the people. The people have to govern the government, so to speak.

All in all, a damn good article. I wish I had written it.

20 posted on 07/07/2003 2:38:20 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford (Check out my blog at: http://cathryncrawford.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson