Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dansangel
It's all down hill now !
37 posted on 07/07/2003 7:23:49 AM PDT by .45MAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: .45MAN
It's all down hill now !

You've got *that* right.

52 posted on 07/07/2003 7:33:11 AM PDT by dansangel (America - love it, support it or LEAVE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: .45MAN; All
It is not downhill now! It is a total wake-up call that we can never let another liberal sit as President and we need to decrease the number of liberal socialist in the House and Senate. We need to start get strict constitutionalist on the bench instead of people like these two!

I implore each and everyone of you to get active in your Congressionial/Senate/Presidential elections that are coming up -- it is mandatory that you not sit back and say it doesn't mean anything!

Every last person who cares about the Constitution, needs to get off their backside and go volunteer and don't have a give-up attitude. In 1994, everyone was saying that we couldn't take the House and Senate -- well some people felt differently and we did.

We need those extra Senators to vote for the Bush nominees and with a SCOTUS nomination looming, it is more important than ever.

Another thing, people on here can quit reacting to is the baiting being done by the Anti-Bush folks with slanted articles and posts. Ignore them and concentrate on the positives. President Bush will "never" appoint anyone but a strict Constitutionalist to the SCOTUS. He has said it time and time again but some folks on here say otherwise -- time to started believing the people that have supported this man since 1994 when he beat Ma Richards and not the anti-Bush groups on here that he never does anything they like and they find articles to support their point of view.

If you see the word "socialist" with President Bush, you can take it to the bank that they come from one of two camps -- DNC/Dean/Clinton or Buchanan -- throw a dart -- not much difference in any of them.

As for Rush -- he is is not always right and anyone that thinks he is better remember that in 1992 he supported Buchanan against President Bush and turned conservatives to Perot which gave us Clinton. Why don't you all ask Rush how many times he voted for President? You might not like the answer.



122 posted on 07/07/2003 8:08:53 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson