To: freedomsnotfree
They wouldn't have said this if they didn't think it was too late for us to do anything about it.
Who thinks we'll hear a word about this from the republican party or the White house?
Breyer's probably hoping he'll get promoted to Chief Justice instead of Sandy.
To: Sabretooth
What do you think about the impending subordiantion of the Constitution to the expansive world view?
27 posted on
07/07/2003 7:17:32 AM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Who thinks we'll hear a word about this from the republican party or the White house? Why should they? It was malcontents like you who supported Peort and gave Clinton the Presidency, letting him appoint Breyer and Ginsburg. And yes Reagan appointed O'Connor, but he also appointed Bork, but Oldsmobile Ted "borked" him. That doesn't really matter since some malcontents on FR were actually glad Kennedy wrecked Bork's nomination.
31 posted on
07/07/2003 7:21:31 AM PDT by
Dane
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Who thinks we'll hear a word about this from the republican party or the White house? Not I when will have a "New World Order" vision "thing" in the White House.
Many have sworn an oath the defend the Constitution and by God that oath is still valid, and it WILL be defended!!!
38 posted on
07/07/2003 7:24:03 AM PDT by
Brian S
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Do you know who makes the decision to appoint Chief Justice?
Is it Bush?
98 posted on
07/07/2003 7:54:13 AM PDT by
M. Peach
(eschew obsfucation)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson