[ClearCase_guy]

Earlier, I called you a dishonest person because you kept saying that Senator McCarthy was gay. You posted no information to back that up. Another poster pointed out that McCarthy was not a life-long bachelor, but did get married. You "corrected" yourself by pointing to a link that (seemed to me) to be full of innuedo implying that his marriage was one of convenience, intended to avoid questions about his exuality. I have seen no real evidence to support this -- merely unsubstantiated innuedo.

You have pointed several times to your "correction" implying that you are not a dishonest person, and that when your errors are pointed out to you, you take steps to correct the record (as any honest person would). But now this:

However, there is plenty of evidence that McCarthy led an "alternate lifestyle"

So, what happened to your correction? Do you have any evidence? Aside from the fact that Roy Cohn worked for him? McCarthy went by far more than guilt by association -- but you seem to have nothing but.

Since you continually imply that the Senator was gay, even though he married a woman, it is incumbent upon you to provide some evidence for this slander. Unless you don't care much about the truth.

[Dave S]

Since you continually imply that the Senator was gay, even though he married a woman, it is incumbent upon you to provide some evidence for this slander. Unless you don't care much about the truth.

How about you hold all the idiots that claim Clinton murdered seventy or so people during his reign in Arkansas and as President to the same standard?