Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Blockbuster in the making? "The Gubinator"
Mercury News ^ | 7/6/03 | Dion Nissenbaum

Posted on 07/06/2003 9:45:07 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/13/2004 3:31:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

In a state known as fertile ground for the surreal, it seems only fitting that California's next governor could be a former bodybuilder, ``Dating Game'' contestant and Hollywood actor who wore a leather loincloth in his breakthrough role.

But if all the stars line up, the Terminator is ready to storm California's sedate capital and transform it into an unparalleled political spectacle befitting a state that brought the world Electric Kool-Aid Acid Tests, Burning Man and the American Taliban.


(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnold; blockbuster; calgov2002; gubinator; making; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
``It's insane,'' said national political analyst Larry Sabato. ``California is nuts.''

Yes , It is!!

1 posted on 07/06/2003 9:45:07 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Gubinator Ping
2 posted on 07/06/2003 9:47:45 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi..Support FR . "California-Fighting the rising tide of socialism" . http://www.DRAFTTom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I would simply love to see Ahhnold inaugurated in his Terminator suit! LOL!
3 posted on 07/06/2003 9:50:27 AM PDT by EggsAckley ( "Aspire to mediocracy"................new motto for publik skools.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I'd rather see him run against Barbara Boxer.
4 posted on 07/06/2003 9:55:00 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
However,most politicians are actors to begin with. Example, look at Clinton turning tears on and off at will, "feeling our pain." Office holders are so bad; why not have a real actor?
5 posted on 07/06/2003 9:57:03 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I already posted this elsewhere, but it bears repeating here:

Arnold will not be any sort of change for California as far as social issues. He is a strong anti-gun force, he is pro-choice and liberal on other social issues. His conservative streak appears in his fiscal policies. In that respect, he may be just what the doctor ordered for the state! There is no doubt he is a superb businessman and knows how to put the state back in the budgetary "black."

However, I'm afraid that this Austrian "cure" is going to propose budgetary reforms that are simply going to be too painful for residents of that state. Additionally, I fear that if the Dems maintain their stranglehold on the state legislature, all you'll get out of a recall and subsequent new election is more gridlock.

One thing is for sure, don't count on him to play the "Terminator" role in real life. The man is a RINO.

6 posted on 07/06/2003 10:06:16 AM PDT by ExSoldier (M1911A1: The ORIGINAL "Point and Click" interface!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Shriver -- who is the late President John F. Kennedy's niece -- has reason to be wary of the spotlight."

Well, she may have reason to be wary, but her job is a TV newsperson, and she married a movie super-star, that's not exactly what I'd call shunning the spotlight. Maybe the author should have said POLITICAL spotlight.

Arnold needs to convince other republicans to back him, and stay off the ballot. Still, I'm not sure he's the right man for the job, that state is in a shambles, not sure it's a task for a newbie. Then again, might be the best thing.

It'll be very interesting to see how this plays out. I only wonder why Ralph Nadar hasn't jumped on board. This is really a game that anyone (except probably Gray Davis) can win. I wouldn't rule out Davis 100% even. I'd think Nadar would have a good chance on a crowded ballot, but instead he is talking about running for President again, I guess his true plan involves not EVER getting a REAL job, just a lot of publicity.
7 posted on 07/06/2003 10:07:55 AM PDT by jocon307 (Enough is enough, and that's too much - Pearl Gould)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
Here's a frightening thought: will Moon Man Brown, mayor of Oakland, that truly far-left enclave in far-left Kalipornia, run again and could he win? Next to Davis, Brown was one of the State's worst govs.
8 posted on 07/06/2003 10:15:58 AM PDT by Paulus Invictus (Adios Kalipornia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"... most recently, spearheaded a successful ballot measure meant to create more after-school programs. Those moves, especially last year's Proposition 49 campaign run by Gorton, were widely viewed as laying the foundation for a run for office. During the initiative battle, Schwarzenegger built a broad, bipartisan coalition to support Proposition 49 and won over many skeptics."

Proposition 49 was the brain-child of dimwits such a Rob Reiner, and Schwarzenegger signed on to it. Proposition 49 was a shining example of the lunacy prevalent in the liberal left. This should speak volumes to potential voters... Schwarzenegger is not a conservative, and a RINO at best!

"Schwarzenegger has described himself as a fiscal conservative and social moderate who supports abortion rights and ``sensible gun control.'' While his positions on most issues aren't well-established, that basic set of views has provided the winning approach for the last Republicans who have held the state's top office."

Schwarzenegger is a Kennedy. This is a winning approach for Republicans? Who would be stupid enough to buy into that dribble.

What is "sensible gun control"? This is an oxymoron perpetrated by this nincompoop to appeal to his core supporters... the liberal left! What Kalifornia doesn't need is more gun control. Crap... we have enough already!

The facts, as they exist, about Schwarzenegger:

"If Schwarzenegger -- and his wife -- can weather the scrutiny, the actor could shake up California's political establishment."

The Peoples Republik of Kalifornia needs someone to provide leadership, not a Kennedy lackey who is nothing more than a mouth-piece for Ted Kennedy's political agenda. Shake up Kalifornia's political establishment indeed! More like send this state further into the abyss.

Tom McClintock is the only person who offers a glimmer of hope to the problems we are facing in this state.
9 posted on 07/06/2003 10:16:24 AM PDT by Duramaximus ( American Born, Gun_Toting , Aerospace Worker Living In A State That Worships Socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
Beyond this RINO stuff (we can't have everything), with him at the capital it will allow non-RINOs to make headway in a heavily leaning DEM state. A Repub Gov will support policies to strengthen the GOP party in the state and provide valuable help during next year's election. It is a chance to make inroads that would be impossible without a him being there. So, the glass is half-full.
10 posted on 07/06/2003 10:23:14 AM PDT by BushCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
"could [Jerry Brown] win?

He'd have a shot, I'd think. In a race like this I think Name Recognition is going to be more important than ever. I kinda like Brown, even the nut-lefty that he is. I'm not sure HE'S the man for the job now either.

I never lived in California, so I'll take your word for it that he was a poor govenor. All you ever hear, way over hear on the East Coast is 1. How California leads the nation and 2. How California is falling apart. These two things in tandem are NOT very encouraging!
11 posted on 07/06/2003 10:39:46 AM PDT by jocon307 (Enough is enough, and that's too much - Pearl Gould)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; *calgov2002; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; snopercod; Grampa Dave; ...
Thanks for the post!

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



12 posted on 07/06/2003 10:48:08 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I'd like to see Chris Cox run against Boxer. KNOCKOUT BOXER VOTE FOR COX! Has a nice ring to it don't ya think? I won't even go into the double intenderes. LOL
13 posted on 07/06/2003 10:52:33 AM PDT by kellynla ("C" 1/5 1st Mar Div Viet Nam '69 & '70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Cox would better than Schwarzenegger because he's far more conservative. What I'm not sure of is whether he could win.
14 posted on 07/06/2003 10:56:25 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Arnie is crazy if he runs and is elected. He can not win!! He';; still have the dems running the legislature. With Arnie as governor, the weasel dems will not change but will have someone to blame. The unions own the dems and they are not going to give up a single state job.

Recall makes ni sense. It just gives the dems an easy excuse. Fortunately, Davis will not be recalled because the petitions will be deemed inadequate by the California Supreme Court whic Davis owns and which still has a red streak from when Justice Byrd was on it.

15 posted on 07/06/2003 11:00:51 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Fortunately, Davis will not be recalled because the petitions will be deemed inadequate by the California Supreme Court

If that happens, California will probably have to come up with the funds to rebuild the court building.

16 posted on 07/06/2003 11:04:10 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I think the independent voters(who have had a belly full of taxes) would vote for Chris Cox in a heartbeat. And we all know that the independent voters, which account for practically twenty percent of the electorate, are the deciding factors in CA. Cox is intelligent, conservative, experienced, sharp as a razor and absolutely no baggage.
17 posted on 07/06/2003 11:18:10 AM PDT by kellynla ("C" 1/5 1st Mar Div Viet Nam '69 & '70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Is he considering running? I haven't heard of an announced opponent to Boxer at all.
18 posted on 07/06/2003 11:31:41 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
"A Repub Gov will support policies to strengthen the GOP party in the state and provide valuable help during next year's election."

Maybe. Let's not forget what family he married into. A RINO is a Democrap waiting to flower.

19 posted on 07/06/2003 11:50:07 AM PDT by ExSoldier (M1911A1: The ORIGINAL "Point and Click" interface!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
Additionally, I fear that if the Dems maintain their stranglehold on the state legislature, all you'll get out of a recall and subsequent new election is more gridlock.

"That government is best which governs least"

Gridlock is good for the state, and good for the government.

I always evaluate the political situation and vote for the candidate who I think will do the least. Actually, if I can find one who I think can really gum up the workings of government, that is my candidate.

What is Arnold's real position on gun control? He says "sensible gun control". The laws we already have are way beyond sensible. If he wants more, then I am against him, but if he thinks we are already beyond "sensible" then he is an electable choice.

20 posted on 07/06/2003 12:38:55 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson