[Principled]

The quality would be no different than from what you can get for free (and it takes 10 seconds to re-label a song). The MP3s you download off of the internet for free are the same quality you'd get if you ripped it off of the CD yourself.

I thought there were random problems... didn't come in right, wrong song label/artist/version/etc. From reading other posts, many problems would be alleviated. I'd love it just because I would be able to buy only what i want without spending a lot on crap. Also, don't have to drive to the store. Guaranteed quality, convenience, and hopefully price and an ability to preview makes it a winner IMO.

[Jhoffa_]

I'd love it just because I would be able to buy only what i want without spending a lot on crap. Also, don't have to drive to the store. Guaranteed quality, convenience, and hopefully price and an ability to preview makes it a winner IMO.

The apple thing is a great idea.

I am very pleased to see it become a reality for just the resons you listed.

[Sofa King]

>I thought there were random problems... didn't come in right, wrong song label/artist/version/etc. From reading other posts, many problems would be alleviated. I'd love it just because I would be able to buy only what i want without spending a lot on crap. Also, don't have to drive to the store. Guaranteed quality, convenience, and hopefully price and an ability to preview makes it a winner IMO.

The inherent problems with using a peer-to-peer file sharing program are there, but they aren't that bad. Most people will put up with a few inconveniences if it means they can get the same product for free.