Replies

So you went out of your way to make an inaccurate attack on copyright law, but the fact that your example was wrong means it wasn't really an attack and you weren't really trying to say copyright law was bad? Am I properly interpreting the Clinton spinmachine here?

So when you said the music is stolen because free is cheaper than any price that can ever be charged that wasn't an excuse ofr thieves that was simply typing for the joy of seeing characters appear on the screen?

I'm beginning to understand. Anything you say that's BS, just plain wrong and easily refuted you actually meant the refutation not what you said. Anything you say that isn't refuted is actually what you meant.

You sure you don't want to run your position by some focus groups to see how it sells on the coast?

So you went out of your way to make an inaccurate attack on copyright law

No, actually it was a question, not an attack. You had posted it was illegal to copy and give to anyone... I replied, "I can't copy some tunes for my wife's road trip?". Further I didn't go out of my way. I was on FR already.

So when you said the music is stolen because free is cheaper than any price that can ever be charged that wasn't an excuse ofr thieves

No, it was part of the reason swapping is so bad. I'm not excusing it - please show me where you think I am doing so - I am providing motivation for taking actions that would reduce swapping.