[discostu]

You are the guy that called copyright law a bad law at the beginning of this thread. You're also the guy that said swapping happened because the RIAA charges too much.

Defending thieves.

Now you're changing your position and claiming you never defended thieves. That's a lie. You know it. I know it. Anyone that's read the thread knows it.

[Principled]

You are the guy that called copyright law a bad law at the beginning of this thread.

Go back and read it....I said it's bad if it prevented me from sharing my music with my wife.

You're also the guy that said swapping happened because the RIAA charges too much.

Not so. I said that swapping happened because the difference between the store price and the "free" price were too great. Swapping would decrease (that's the goal) by shortening this gap.

Your papaphrasing shows your intent.

So, back to the drawing board. BTW, stu, you have already admitted (in this very thread) that you were wrong to assert that I was defending thieves. Are you changing positions, AGAIN???