Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA: Al-Qaeda worked with ex-Pak scientists [Al-Qaeda has nukes! ]
Hindustan Times.com ^ | 7/4/2003 | Staff Writers

Posted on 07/05/2003 11:45:35 PM PDT by ex-Texan

CIA: Al-Qaeda worked with ex-Pak scientists [Al-Qaeda has nukes! ]

Despite repeated Pakistani denials, US intelligence agency CIA has said international terrorist outfit al-Qaeda was working with two former Pakistani scientists and is currently capable of conducting attacks with chemical, biological, radiological or even nuclear weapons.

The CIA in a May 2003 report entitled 'Terrorist CBRN: Materials and Effects' named former scientists of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission as Bashir Ud-din Mahmood and Abdul Majeed saying al Qaeda was working with them. These charges have been denied by Pakistani officials.

Handwritten documents uncovered in Afghanistan suggest that Al-Qaeda's specialists did have nuclear physics and weaponisation knowledge that exceeded the type of information available via open and declassified sources, the study reported in 'Jane's Intelligence Digest' said.

The report said the Al-Qaeda, and to a lesser extent other terrorist groups, are currently capable of conducting attacks with biological or even nuclear weapons and that it was "a high probability" that it would be in the next two years.

The US assessment claims that any such CBRN attack would probably be "small-scale", incorporating relatively crude delivery means and easily produced or obtained chemicals, toxins or radiological substances.

Much of the evidence for these claims is drawn from documents, diagrams and other material found at around 40 sites in Afghanistan where Al-Qaeda operated training camps for its militants.

The authors of the CIA report believed Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups to be capable of making an "improvised nuclear device" that would be "intended to cause a yield-producing nuclear explosion".

The report claims that the group's experts could make such a weapon with "diverted nuclear-weapons components", by modifying an already assembled nuclear weapon or by using a self-designed weapon.

As has been emphasised by both scientists and intelligence community sources, the nuclear threat from terrorists is more likely to be from radiological weapons than from a nuclear device, and that materials for such weapons - such as caesium 137, strontium 90 and cobalt 60 - are widely used in hospitals, universities and various industries.

Al-Qaeda is also claimed by the CIA report to have "crude procedures" for making mustard agent, sarin and VX, as well as access to toxic cyanides and less dangerous industrial materials, such as chlorine and phosgene.

Members of Al-Qaeda cells are alleged to have attempted to launch 'poison plot' attacks in Europe with chemicals and toxins. The relatively easy availability of many common chemicals which could have dual-use adds credibility to this assertion, the CIA report added.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedanukes; cia; kahn; nukes; nukethreat; pakistan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: ex-Texan
Israel and USA are duty bound to have nuclear missiles with coordinates loaded for Mecca, Medina and Qom.
21 posted on 07/06/2003 6:08:33 AM PDT by dennisw (G-d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holyh2o
Thanks for posting your message. I believe you may be correct. Before 9/11 I had a dream that there was a terror attack on NY and DC. Then I had a really bad dream about an attack on Los Angeles. I told a few friends who were shocked by what I related and then pulled up stakes and left to return to Portland.
22 posted on 07/06/2003 6:41:56 AM PDT by ex-Texan (My tag line is broken !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Bumping #11
23 posted on 07/06/2003 1:08:34 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a monthly donor to Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Why thank you Gramma :)
24 posted on 07/06/2003 1:10:02 PM PDT by chance33_98 (http://home.frognet.net/~thowell/haunt/ ---->our ghosty page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
You're WELCOME!
25 posted on 07/06/2003 1:12:59 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a monthly donor to Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Because their ship hasn't been able to break the shadow of our Navy or satellite tracking?
26 posted on 07/06/2003 1:13:42 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
bump
27 posted on 07/06/2003 1:32:03 PM PDT by furnitureman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan; holyh2o
Amazing how many people have had similar dreams/visions.

I, too, know the gist of those scenarios is true and have had the foreboding feeling since about '99.

But I have no idea if the events come to fruition in one day from now or 100 years.

The Lord must be aghast at some of the stuff going on today.

28 posted on 07/06/2003 1:34:09 PM PDT by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
I can't say when either my friend, God Bless.
29 posted on 07/06/2003 2:42:30 PM PDT by holyh2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
If they really had nukes, why have they not already been used?

Many people ask this and it is an obvious and realistic question. Why wasn't a nuke or other major WMD used on 9/11 if they possessed one? I remember shortly after 9/11 Oliver North said "That was their best shot" (meaning the hijacked planes).

We all have to hope that is true. However, in the terrorists' minds there was a job left undone from '93 (destroying the WTC). Given their great persistence and single-mindedness on that target, it is easy to understand why those two buildings were more important as an immediate goal than killing an even larger number of Americans elsewhere.

With each day that goes by without another major terror attack in the U.S., I have to allow for the ghoulish possibility that the probability of a really large attack increases. The goal to kill the infidels hasn't changed and they aren't going to wait 2 or 5 or 10 years just to pick off a few Americans with a sniper or something like that.

30 posted on 07/06/2003 4:12:56 PM PDT by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
Bin laden has said, in like 1997, he is after 1.5 million Americans as payback for equivalent mooslime deaths by the US up to that time.
31 posted on 07/28/2003 5:39:03 PM PDT by Imperialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
capable of conducting attacks with chemical, biological, radiological or even nuclear weapons

Kind of a step between the rest and nuclear weapons. A big step. An infinitely huge step. Once it has progressed to nuclear weapons, the rest do not matter. The step is not to be dismissed casually like this.

32 posted on 07/28/2003 5:42:14 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson