[beckett]

Obviously you are irked because Schwartz connected you to Randall Royer the other day. I find it interesting that your counter-attack by proxy deals with silly Trotskyite politics rather than Royer. In any case, Horowitz-on-steroids Stephen Schwartz is not a conservative anyway, nor has he ever claimed to be one.

Yawn.

[Justin Raimondo]

I think being regularly published in National Review, and the Weakly (sub)Standard, as well as proclaiming your "conservatism" in an interview with The Atlantic:

http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/interviews/int2003-03-20.htm Here is what Schwartz and his fellow neocons consider to be "conservatism" (neocon-style):

"If there's anything right now that's painful for me to have to say, because I do consider myself a conservative on issues like private property and privatization, it's that the record of big oil—Standard Oil and its successors—has been so negative in the history of our country for so long that maybe the only solution is to have congressional hearings on the role of big oil in covering for and fronting for the Saudis. Maybe the only solution is to do what people wanted to do in 1907, which is to nationalize big oil."

Yeah, "nationalize 'Big Oil'"! Neocons = Neo-communism.

[Justin Raimondo]

And as for The Schwartz "connecting" me to Randall Royer: that's true only if you mean by "connecting" putting my name in the same sentence with Royer's. Otherwise, there is no "connection."

[veronica]

Obviously you are irked because Schwartz connected you to Randall Royer the other day...

Portrait of a Wahhabi

Former CAIR Officer Indicted (Randall Royer)