Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beckett
I think being regularly published in National Review, and the Weakly (sub)Standard, as well as proclaiming your "conservatism" in an interview with The Atlantic:

http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/interviews/int2003-03-20.htm Here is what Schwartz and his fellow neocons consider to be "conservatism" (neocon-style):

"If there's anything right now that's painful for me to have to say, because I do consider myself a conservative on issues like private property and privatization, it's that the record of big oil—Standard Oil and its successors—has been so negative in the history of our country for so long that maybe the only solution is to have congressional hearings on the role of big oil in covering for and fronting for the Saudis. Maybe the only solution is to do what people wanted to do in 1907, which is to nationalize big oil."

Yeah, "nationalize 'Big Oil'"! Neocons = Neo-communism.

4 posted on 07/05/2003 11:24:58 AM PDT by Justin Raimondo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Justin Raimondo
Please -- you picked a quote that made my case for me! Schwartz is no conservative, a few cryptic words about "private property" notwithstanding.
7 posted on 07/05/2003 11:52:10 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson