Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"The Meaning of July Fourth for the Negro"
PBS Africans in America Web site ^ | 1852 | Frederick Douglass

Posted on 07/03/2003 5:16:46 PM PDT by ArcLight

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: Moosefart
I enjoyed To Kill a Mockingbird too. But my moniker is after Julius Ceasar's wife, Calpernia.
81 posted on 07/04/2003 7:00:33 AM PDT by Calpernia (Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ArcLight
I'm glad to see my fellow Freepers know a great speech when they see it. God bless America!
82 posted on 07/04/2003 9:17:26 AM PDT by ArcLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
I enjoyed To Kill a Mockingbird too. But my moniker is after Julius Ceasar's wife, Calpernia.

My mistake. (I didnt know Calpernia was Ceasars wife's name.) Learn something new every day. :)

83 posted on 07/04/2003 1:11:56 PM PDT by Moosefart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ArcLight
151 years later, what another AMERICAN thinks of July 4th:


  

The Fourth of July
Thomas Sowell

July 6, 2003 

Why do we celebrate the Fourth of July? After all, we are taught from kindergarten to the universities that all cultures are entitled to equal respect. Why then celebrate the creation of a nation that is no better than any other nation?

Indeed, if you heard only the litany of sins from American history that our students get throughout their years in educational institutions, you might think that the United States was worse than a lot of other places.

Most people, however, believe their own eyes, their own ears and their own personal experiences. That is why America is like a magnet, drawing people from the farthest corners of the world. Talk show host Ken Hamblin wrote a book whose title says it all: Pick a Better Country.

Nothing is easier than finding worse countries. The mass graves discovered in Iraq, the persecution of women in Afghanistan, the atrocities in Rwanda, the starvation in North Korea, the continuing slavery in the Sudan, and the brutal totalitarianism in the left's beloved Cuba are just some examples that come immediately to mind.

Those who continue to repeat the dogma of "equal respect" for all cultures and the mindless mantra of being "non-judgmental" must have a faith which passeth all understanding. Do they seriously believe what they are saying or do they think this sort of cant is necessary in order to avoid being hit with a nasty label like chauvinist or racist?

Nobody claims that the remarkable prosperity, freedom and common decency among Americans are due to race because the American population is made up of people from all the races around the world. It cannot be natural resources because the Soviet Union and its successor states have had at least comparable resources. Yet that never translated into an American standard of living for ordinary people.

It is hard to find a tangible thing to credit with the rare good fortune of the American people. But that only shows the importance of intangible things.

You cannot see, weigh or touch a culture but you can hardly avoid its impact. One remarkable feature of the culture that we have all inherited from the Anglo-American tradition is the rule of law. When the British beheaded King Charles I, it established in unmistakable terms that no one was above the law. That has become part of the legacy of the whole English-speaking world.

In recent years, economists have begun to understand the enormous effect of the rule of law on economic progress. Where there is no rule of law, the richest natural resources and even an educated professional class mean little in terms of raising a country's standards of living.

One of the other legacies of Western civilization is a universalism that is foreign to many other cultures and is new even in the West, having developed only within the past couple of centuries -- and of course having developed imperfectly, as all things human are imperfect.

Perhaps nothing so epitomized this universalism as Queen Victoria's weeping when she read Uncle Tom's Cabin. There could be no greater social distance than that between the ruler of the largest empire the world had ever known and a slave being whipped on the other side of an ocean. But she recognized that we are all people, whatever our status or condition.

Simple as this might seem, it would never have occurred to Genghis Khan to be concerned about the sufferings of others, except as a source of amusement and aggrandizement. And it would never have occurred to those in the Middle East who danced in the streets on September 11, 2001.

How can you square universalism with slavery? You can't. That is what ultimately destroyed slavery in the West and led the West to destroy slavery in other parts of the world -- over the bitter opposition of non-Western cultures.

Tragically, it has recently become fashionable in the West to move backward from universalism toward tribalism, as the intelligentsia seek to Balkanize and promote collective guilt by race. They will never succeed so long as we all celebrate the Fourth of July as Americans.


84 posted on 07/06/2003 10:33:02 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (We're in a global war on terrorism..If you want to call that a quagmire, do it. I don't.*Rummy* 6-30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
MYTH: Slavery was uncommon and very short-lived in the North, and had little economic impact there.

The North didn't rely on on slavery for it's economic survival.

MYTH: The North ended slavery because it was offensive to the moral character of Northerners.

It wasn't an official position but there were something like 5,000 anti-slavery organizations in the North.

MYTH: Lincoln freed the slaves,...

I guess it is a myth since it was the Union Army that did the actual act of freeing the southern slaves. The amendment came later.

MYTH: Secession was just a scheme by Southern slaveholders to protect their slave property.

I don't know about the other slave states but five slave states wrote Declaration of Secessions and slavery was the most repeated reason.
85 posted on 07/06/2003 10:49:28 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Note: this topic is from 7/03/2003. Original from 1852. Thanks ArcLight.

86 posted on 07/04/2015 8:31:04 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson